You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dictionaries can be expensive from a storage point of view in small environments. Compressing them is effective in reducing hunspell's footprint. i performed an experiment to measure the sizes of the default hunspell dictionaries with compression:
As you can see both hz and gz show significant gains, so i support both of them. I think gzip is particularly valuable as it is ubiquitous and performs well.
I have submitted a PR that implements the necessary change
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dictionaries can be expensive from a storage point of view in small environments. Compressing them is effective in reducing hunspell's footprint. i performed an experiment to measure the sizes of the default hunspell dictionaries with compression:
As you can see both hz and gz show significant gains, so i support both of them. I think gzip is particularly valuable as it is ubiquitous and performs well.
I have submitted a PR that implements the necessary change
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: