You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Just to keep track of an issue we already discussed.
At the current state, to get relation cardinalities information we have to get the relation properties and then get information about cardinalities.
It would be nice in the future to get information directly from a relation type.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I like the idea, but we must agree about how. The Cardinality class has multiple methods for retrieving lower and upper bounds in different ways. Replicating these methods on the Relation class API will add a dozen methods approximately.
P.s.: you may be interested in the method isMandatory(): boolean.
Just to keep track of an issue we already discussed.
At the current state, to get relation cardinalities information we have to get the relation properties and then get information about cardinalities.
It would be nice in the future to get information directly from a relation type.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: