You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks Adam for this great repository and for sharing it with everyone.
I compiled it and found that the BPM values are most of the time a bit lower (1 - 4) than the actual values.
You can find the details of my approach here. https://github.com/juandmi/BTrack/blob/master/BPMCalc/README.md
It would be great if you could check and tell me if I'm doing something wrong or if this discrepancy is normal.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi Adam, thanks for your mail. That sounds like a plausible root cause
although this would be a 10% deviation where my observed deviation is below
4%. Still worse checking it.
Cheers,
Michael
From: ztsvvstz1337 ***@***.***>
Sent: Freitag, 9. August 2024 19:09
To: adamstark/BTrack ***@***.***>
Cc: Michael Mergell ***@***.***>; Author
***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [adamstark/BTrack] BPM values are slightly below the actual
values (Issue #21)
Hi, this might be quite late, but I figured nowhere in the library is
mentioned on what sample rate to use and there also isnt a way to set it (?)
So my guess is your sample rate is ~48khz but BTrack expects 44khz, thus
you'd have to resample first.
-
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#21 (comment)> , or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEHJKN3XFKWQN2B3IIL55QTZQ
TZTXAVCNFSM6AAAAABIJFZ2HGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDENZYGM4DC
OJZHA> .
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
<https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AEHJKNY2G7EKCQDDKR7V5HLZQTZTXA5CNFS
M6AAAAABIJFZ2HGWGG33NNVSW45C7OR4XAZNMJFZXG5LFINXW23LFNZ2KUY3PNVWWK3TUL5UWJTU
HZVM24.gif> Message ID: ***@***.***
***@***.***> >
Might be good to keep these tempo vs beat discussions to that thread :)
In short: the tempo estimation is a "rough guide" for the beat tracker, and not intended to be used by people as an accurate tempo value. I am working on making this clearer and perhaps providing a full tempo estimate also.
Thanks Adam for this great repository and for sharing it with everyone.
I compiled it and found that the BPM values are most of the time a bit lower (1 - 4) than the actual values.
You can find the details of my approach here.
https://github.com/juandmi/BTrack/blob/master/BPMCalc/README.md
It would be great if you could check and tell me if I'm doing something wrong or if this discrepancy is normal.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: