Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Quickwit comparison #15768

Open
sandstrom opened this issue Jan 15, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Quickwit comparison #15768

sandstrom opened this issue Jan 15, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@sandstrom
Copy link

sandstrom commented Jan 15, 2025

Quickwit has garnered a lot of attention the past year, as a contender to Loki.

However, Datadog recently purchased them, so it's unclear if the product will be shut down or live on (assumes the community will take over maintenance).

Given all this, it would be interesting if Grafana/Loki would:

  • Publish a comparison or explanation of how Quickwit/Loki are different, and strength/weaknesses (preferably neutral).
  • If there are shortcomings in Loki, maybe mention any plans to fix them, i.e where will Loki be inspired by Quickwit?

I don't know if it's feasible, but perhaps even consider "taking over" development, assuming I've read their we are joining Datadog blog post correctly and that the current core team will no longer develop Quickwit.

cc @owen-d @cyriltovena

I know this isn't an issue, but there is no discussions tab active on this repo. Feel free to close after you've read it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants