You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to know whether the inclusion of Exhibit B of the MPL 2.0 in the license for this library was intentional, or merely just a mistake.
The fact that this license is "Incompatible With Secondary Licenses" essentially means that the software may not be used to create a "Larger Work" licensed under the (L)GPL.
The (L)GPL are still some of the most popular OSS licenses, so I'm quite surprised to have found this notice in this library's license.
Mozilla's FAQ mentions this incompatibility between the licenses when Exhibit B has been included: https:///www.mozilla.org/en-US/MPL/2.0/FAQ/#mpl-and-lgpl
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi there!
I would like to know whether the inclusion of Exhibit B of the MPL 2.0 in the license for this library was intentional, or merely just a mistake.
The fact that this license is "Incompatible With Secondary Licenses" essentially means that the software may not be used to create a "Larger Work" licensed under the (L)GPL.
The (L)GPL are still some of the most popular OSS licenses, so I'm quite surprised to have found this notice in this library's license.
Mozilla's FAQ mentions this incompatibility between the licenses when Exhibit B has been included: https:///www.mozilla.org/en-US/MPL/2.0/FAQ/#mpl-and-lgpl
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: