Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

deploy Waypoint yaml UX issue #10490

Open
linsun opened this issue Jan 22, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

deploy Waypoint yaml UX issue #10490

linsun opened this issue Jan 22, 2025 · 0 comments
Assignees
@stevenctl
Labels
Type: Enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@linsun
Copy link
Contributor

linsun commented Jan 22, 2025 •
edited
Loading

K8sGateway Version

latest

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

related to #10453

When deploying a waypoint, currently, not only i have to specify the class name but also the proxy protocol and port like below:

  listeners:
  - name: proxy
    port: 15088
    protocol: istio.io/PROXY

Describe the solution you'd like

This could be a friction for users using istio-waypoint today. Could we not requiring users to do this?

Also, we 'd prefer consistent class name between kgateway to gloo: kgateway-waypoint, perhaps?

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional Context

No response
@linsun linsun added the Type: Enhancement New feature or request label Jan 22, 2025
@linsun linsun changed the title deployy Waypoint yaml UX issue deploy Waypoint yaml UX issue Jan 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@stevenctl stevenctl

Labels
Type: Enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@linsun @stevenctl