-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 99
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Pydocstyle release 6.2.0 breaks pylama #232
Comments
Any updates on this one? |
real-yfprojects
added a commit
to real-yfprojects/req2flatpak
that referenced
this issue
Feb 14, 2023
Pydocstyle is a pylama dependency. However pylama doesn't support the newest pydocstyle version. See klen/pylama#232. * poetry.lock: Update. * pyproject.toml: Lock pydocstyle version.
real-yfprojects
added a commit
to real-yfprojects/req2flatpak
that referenced
this issue
Feb 14, 2023
Pydocstyle is a pylama dependency. However pylama doesn't support the newest pydocstyle version. See klen/pylama#232. * poetry.lock: Update. * pyproject.toml: Lock pydocstyle version.
real-yfprojects
added a commit
to johannesjh/req2flatpak
that referenced
this issue
Feb 19, 2023
Pydocstyle is a pylama dependency. However pylama doesn't support the newest pydocstyle version. See klen/pylama#232. * poetry.lock: Update. * pyproject.toml: Lock pydocstyle version.
When this fix is going to be published? |
ovsrobot
pushed a commit
to ovsrobot/dpdk
that referenced
this issue
Nov 6, 2023
Python docstrings are the in-code way to document the code. The docstring checker of choice is pydocstyle which we're executing from Pylama, but the current latest versions are not complatible due to [0], so pin the pydocstyle version to the latest working version. [0] klen/pylama#232 Signed-off-by: Juraj Linkeš <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: 0-day Robot <[email protected]>
ovsrobot
pushed a commit
to ovsrobot/dpdk
that referenced
this issue
Nov 8, 2023
Python docstrings are the in-code way to document the code. The docstring checker of choice is pydocstyle which we're executing from Pylama, but the current latest versions are not complatible due to [0], so pin the pydocstyle version to the latest working version. [0] klen/pylama#232 Signed-off-by: Juraj Linkeš <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: 0-day Robot <[email protected]>
ovsrobot
pushed a commit
to ovsrobot/dpdk
that referenced
this issue
Nov 15, 2023
Python docstrings are the in-code way to document the code. The docstring checker of choice is pydocstyle which we're executing from Pylama, but the current latest versions are not complatible due to [0], so pin the pydocstyle version to the latest working version. [0] klen/pylama#232 Signed-off-by: Juraj Linkeš <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: 0-day Robot <[email protected]>
ovsrobot
pushed a commit
to ovsrobot/dpdk
that referenced
this issue
Nov 23, 2023
Python docstrings are the in-code way to document the code. The docstring checker of choice is pydocstyle which we're executing from Pylama, but the current latest versions are not complatible due to [0], so pin the pydocstyle version to the latest working version. [0] klen/pylama#232 Signed-off-by: Juraj Linkeš <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: 0-day Robot <[email protected]>
ovsrobot
pushed a commit
to ovsrobot/dpdk
that referenced
this issue
Dec 4, 2023
Python docstrings are the in-code way to document the code. The docstring checker of choice is pydocstyle which we're executing from Pylama, but the current latest versions are not complatible due to [0], so pin the pydocstyle version to the latest working version. [0] klen/pylama#232 Signed-off-by: Juraj Linkeš <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: 0-day Robot <[email protected]>
dpdk-replication
pushed a commit
to DPDK/dpdk
that referenced
this issue
Dec 21, 2023
Python docstrings are the in-code way to document the code. The docstring checker of choice is pydocstyle which we're executing from Pylama, but the current latest versions are not complatible due to [0], so pin the pydocstyle version to the latest working version. [0] klen/pylama#232 Signed-off-by: Juraj Linkeš <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
With the release of pydocstyle 6.2.0, they changed the method signature of
PyDocChecker().check_source
to have an additional parameterhttps://github.com/PyCQA/pydocstyle/pull/546/files#diff-8036a1f043bf5856770399b0a1b5b13e7fc59cd1fc2e6bc2d8ca93f49a5d3406R134
So now it is passing in the
ignore_inline_noqa
value to theproperty_decorators
param inpylama_pycodestyle.py
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: