Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Spike in EFS client connections after upgrading from version 1.7.7 to version 2.0.6 #1435

Open
gurskyi277 opened this issue Aug 9, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
kind/support Categorizes issue or PR as a support question. lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.

Comments

@gurskyi277
Copy link

We noticed that after updating the add-on of aws-efs-csi-driver from version 1.77 to version 2.0.6 on our EKS cluster, there was an increase in client connections to the EFS, which is simultaneously mounted to several of our services running in EKS.

In version 1.7.7, there were 2 client connections regardless of the number of pods using EFS. After upgrading to version 2.0.6, the number of connections increased, proportional to the number of pods using EFS multiplied by 2.

This is not an issue, but we would like to understand if this is the correct behavior after the driver update, or if it might be a misconfiguration on our part.

/triage support

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@gurskyi277: The label(s) triage/support cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them.

In response to this:

We noticed that after updating the add-on of aws-efs-csi-driver from version 1.77 to version 2.0.6 on our EKS cluster, there was an increase in client connections to the EFS, which is simultaneously mounted to several of our services running in EKS.

In version 1.7.7, there were 2 client connections regardless of the number of pods using EFS. After upgrading to version 2.0.6, the number of connections increased, proportional to the number of pods using EFS multiplied by 2.

This is not an issue, but we would like to understand if this is the correct behavior after the driver update, or if it might be a misconfiguration on our part.

/triage support

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@avanish23
Copy link
Contributor

/kind support

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/support Categorizes issue or PR as a support question. label Oct 5, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/support Categorizes issue or PR as a support question. lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants