2019winter_output.txt

C:\Users\shift\AppData\Local\Programs\Python\Python37-32\python.exe "E:/Duke/Summer 2019/Research/parser/transcriptParser.py"
Do you want to input conversation labels manually? (Y/N):
Do you want to input true sentiment (pros/cons) labels manually? (Y/N):Y
C:\Users\shift\AppData\Local\Programs\Python\Python37-32\lib\site-packages\smart_open\smart_open_lib.py:398: UserWarning: This function is deprecated, use smart_open.open instead. See the migration notes for details: https://github.com/RaRe-Technologies/smart_open/blob/master/README.rst#migrating-to-the-new-open-function
  'See the migration notes for details: %s' % _MIGRATION_NOTES_URL
---------
New section
---------
Brigitte Pawliw-Fry:I disagree with us. I think that police officers should not be allowed to inquire about the immigration status because I believe it prevents victims of crimes from coming forward and therefore having like no justice essentially.
  0.770089 con immigration A1 victims of crimes who are undocumented or have family who are undocumented are often afraid of coming forward because the police could ask about their immigration status or that of their family this creates population of silent victims and may discourage the reporting of crimes
  0.770089 con immigration A1 victims of crimes who are undocumented or have family who are undocumented are often afraid of coming forward because the police could ask about their immigration status or that of their family this creates population of silent victims and may discourage the reporting of crimes
  0.575793 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.555746 con immigration A1 if victims are afraid to come forward to report the crime it could make it easier for crime to happen in those areas
  0.473784 pro immigration A1 if police officer cannot identify the perpetrator of crime domestic violence where victim fights back in self defense and has probable cause that either party is in the country illegally the officer should be allowed to inquire about the immigration status of all parties
  0.460457 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.352094 con immigration A1 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):0
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):1
Ronald Pritipaul:Yeah, I also agree with this premise. I am like my my parents or my mother is undocumented immigrant or was wondering I shouldn't Citizen and it was like he instilled in me from pretty young age to not go to the police. So definitely there might have been situations when I was younger where it would be better if I went to the police. So I think like not asking kind of has some pretty direct impacts.
  0.574415 pro campaignFinanceReform A2 the status quo discourages grassroots and or third party candidates
  0.560065 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.386774 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.335232 con immigration A1 victims of crimes who are undocumented or have family who are undocumented are often afraid of coming forward because the police could ask about their immigration status or that of their family this creates population of silent victims and may discourage the reporting of crimes
  0.204646 pro immigration A1 if police officer cannot identify the perpetrator of crime domestic violence where victim fights back in self defense and has probable cause that either party is in the country illegally the officer should be allowed to inquire about the immigration status of all parties
  0.043550 con immigration A1 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
  -0.041934 con immigration A1 if victims are afraid to come forward to report the crime it could make it easier for crime to happen in those areas
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):0
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):1
Sam Duffy:Just as a general question for the group, What are the potential impacts of having someone who is undocumented immigrants have to come into court and give testimony crying for something along the lines of let's say there's a robbery and still only people who are we just have to be undocumented how to be necessary for the police officer and are you coming or not?
  0.601610 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.601610 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.548062 con immigration A1 victims of crimes who are undocumented or have family who are undocumented are often afraid of coming forward because the police could ask about their immigration status or that of their family this creates population of silent victims and may discourage the reporting of crimes
  0.357795 pro immigration A1 if police officer cannot identify the perpetrator of crime domestic violence where victim fights back in self defense and has probable cause that either party is in the country illegally the officer should be allowed to inquire about the immigration status of all parties
  0.172166 con immigration A1 if victims are afraid to come forward to report the crime it could make it easier for crime to happen in those areas
  0.121454 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.039171 con immigration A1 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"): 
Ronald Pritipaul:Places you can still haven't got too many people be witnesses to crimes. It just like doesn't really matter if we asked about theirs.
  0.620011 con campaignFinanceReform A1 corporations are people and have rights to speak and act politically
  0.580548 pro immigration A4 without legal assistance many immigrants are often unaware of how their rights can be defended
  0.406238 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.137399 con immigration A1 victims of crimes who are undocumented or have family who are undocumented are often afraid of coming forward because the police could ask about their immigration status or that of their family this creates population of silent victims and may discourage the reporting of crimes
  0.083046 con immigration A1 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
  0.037425 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  -0.009870 con immigration A1 if victims are afraid to come forward to report the crime it could make it easier for crime to happen in those areas
  -0.027352 pro immigration A1 if police officer cannot identify the perpetrator of crime domestic violence where victim fights back in self defense and has probable cause that either party is in the country illegally the officer should be allowed to inquire about the immigration status of all parties
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):0
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):2
Sam Duffy:I think you can go ahead now.
  0.000000 pro microworkers A1 every vote will count in whatever state it is cast
  0.000000 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.000000 pro immigration A1 if police officer cannot identify the perpetrator of crime domestic violence where victim fights back in self defense and has probable cause that either party is in the country illegally the officer should be allowed to inquire about the immigration status of all parties
  0.000000 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.000000 con immigration A1 victims of crimes who are undocumented or have family who are undocumented are often afraid of coming forward because the police could ask about their immigration status or that of their family this creates population of silent victims and may discourage the reporting of crimes
  0.000000 con immigration A1 if victims are afraid to come forward to report the crime it could make it easier for crime to happen in those areas
  0.000000 con immigration A1 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
Pros/cons label: 0
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Brigitte Pawliw-Fry:I would anyone else like to add anything.
  0.931789 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.931789 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.096777 pro immigration A1 if police officer cannot identify the perpetrator of crime domestic violence where victim fights back in self defense and has probable cause that either party is in the country illegally the officer should be allowed to inquire about the immigration status of all parties
  0.052976 con immigration A1 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
  0.020896 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  -0.025627 con immigration A1 victims of crimes who are undocumented or have family who are undocumented are often afraid of coming forward because the police could ask about their immigration status or that of their family this creates population of silent victims and may discourage the reporting of crimes
  -0.039227 con immigration A1 if victims are afraid to come forward to report the crime it could make it easier for crime to happen in those areas
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Sam Duffy:What do you guys think when it's chilly qualifying as Reasonable Suspicion Princeton's had to have some a question being asked. Oh you can never asked upon the immigration status. I think that it's it's really important to be able to distinguish at one point. Is it necessary for instance if it was going to court or otherwise?
  0.480315 pro immigration A4 not being able to afford legal services in immigration proceedings could result in unnecessary deportation this could split families apart and could place undue burdens on families and even the tax payers should children have to end up as wards of the state
  0.480315 pro immigration A4 not being able to afford legal services in immigration proceedings could result in unnecessary deportation this could split families apart and could place undue burdens on families and even the tax payers should children have to end up as wards of the state
  0.428465 con immigration A1 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
  0.221689 pro immigration A1 if police officer cannot identify the perpetrator of crime domestic violence where victim fights back in self defense and has probable cause that either party is in the country illegally the officer should be allowed to inquire about the immigration status of all parties
  0.210610 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.208987 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.193620 con immigration A1 victims of crimes who are undocumented or have family who are undocumented are often afraid of coming forward because the police could ask about their immigration status or that of their family this creates population of silent victims and may discourage the reporting of crimes
  0.117556 con immigration A1 if victims are afraid to come forward to report the crime it could make it easier for crime to happen in those areas
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Brigitte Pawliw-Fry:I mean, I think police officers have a very particular role where the federal immigration officers for example are specialized to focus on immigration. And obviously I believe that I should be abolished and just in this case like police officers are thinking about like a bang laws locally not in terms of like I don't know whether or not you're undocumented. So I don't think that there is like a case where there could be need to ask anyways.
  0.946077 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.946077 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.478379 con immigration A1 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
  0.277940 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.243479 con immigration A1 victims of crimes who are undocumented or have family who are undocumented are often afraid of coming forward because the police could ask about their immigration status or that of their family this creates population of silent victims and may discourage the reporting of crimes
  0.226583 pro immigration A1 if police officer cannot identify the perpetrator of crime domestic violence where victim fights back in self defense and has probable cause that either party is in the country illegally the officer should be allowed to inquire about the immigration status of all parties
  0.018886 con immigration A1 if victims are afraid to come forward to report the crime it could make it easier for crime to happen in those areas
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):0
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):3
Ronald Pritipaul:Yeah, the only like situation. I think a police officer might need to inquire about the immigration status of victims might be like in human trafficking cases. But in that regard that would probably be on September Federal like place or like a federal agent. So I really don't see a reason why I would become necessary for like victims of crimes to be Aster immigration status.
  0.803438 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.803438 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.520939 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.483707 con immigration A1 victims of crimes who are undocumented or have family who are undocumented are often afraid of coming forward because the police could ask about their immigration status or that of their family this creates population of silent victims and may discourage the reporting of crimes
  0.476064 pro immigration A1 if police officer cannot identify the perpetrator of crime domestic violence where victim fights back in self defense and has probable cause that either party is in the country illegally the officer should be allowed to inquire about the immigration status of all parties
  0.275004 con immigration A1 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
  0.252912 con immigration A1 if victims are afraid to come forward to report the crime it could make it easier for crime to happen in those areas
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):1
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):2
Sam Duffy:Michael Cade any comments
  0.000000 pro microworkers A1 every vote will count in whatever state it is cast
  0.000000 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.000000 pro immigration A1 if police officer cannot identify the perpetrator of crime domestic violence where victim fights back in self defense and has probable cause that either party is in the country illegally the officer should be allowed to inquire about the immigration status of all parties
  0.000000 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.000000 con immigration A1 victims of crimes who are undocumented or have family who are undocumented are often afraid of coming forward because the police could ask about their immigration status or that of their family this creates population of silent victims and may discourage the reporting of crimes
  0.000000 con immigration A1 if victims are afraid to come forward to report the crime it could make it easier for crime to happen in those areas
  0.000000 con immigration A1 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
Pros/cons label: 0
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Michael Mosle:I pretty much agree. I think it's it's pretty obvious that if you think that you could get your family or yourself in trouble by going forward to reporting a crime that's going to be a clear. If you do not do that. And I think that ultimately should be the police the job of the police is to kind of make sure the crimes reported and and it's not their job to deal with immigration.
  0.754453 con immigration A1 victims of crimes who are undocumented or have family who are undocumented are often afraid of coming forward because the police could ask about their immigration status or that of their family this creates population of silent victims and may discourage the reporting of crimes
  0.754453 con immigration A1 victims of crimes who are undocumented or have family who are undocumented are often afraid of coming forward because the police could ask about their immigration status or that of their family this creates population of silent victims and may discourage the reporting of crimes
  0.689623 con immigration A1 if victims are afraid to come forward to report the crime it could make it easier for crime to happen in those areas
  0.406480 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.325701 pro immigration A1 if police officer cannot identify the perpetrator of crime domestic violence where victim fights back in self defense and has probable cause that either party is in the country illegally the officer should be allowed to inquire about the immigration status of all parties
  0.204558 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.027349 con immigration A1 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):0
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):1
Cade May:I also agree. I think that at the level it's more important that people feel like they are supposed to report things that need to be reported rather than dealing with something like immigration. I agree.
  0.547583 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.547583 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.197794 pro immigration A1 if police officer cannot identify the perpetrator of crime domestic violence where victim fights back in self defense and has probable cause that either party is in the country illegally the officer should be allowed to inquire about the immigration status of all parties
  0.145283 con immigration A1 if victims are afraid to come forward to report the crime it could make it easier for crime to happen in those areas
  0.082571 con immigration A1 victims of crimes who are undocumented or have family who are undocumented are often afraid of coming forward because the police could ask about their immigration status or that of their family this creates population of silent victims and may discourage the reporting of crimes
  0.057870 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.020540 con immigration A1 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):0
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):2
Michael Mosle:We still can't hear you. I'm sorry.
  0.000000 pro microworkers A1 every vote will count in whatever state it is cast
  0.000000 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.000000 pro immigration A1 if police officer cannot identify the perpetrator of crime domestic violence where victim fights back in self defense and has probable cause that either party is in the country illegally the officer should be allowed to inquire about the immigration status of all parties
  0.000000 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.000000 con immigration A1 victims of crimes who are undocumented or have family who are undocumented are often afraid of coming forward because the police could ask about their immigration status or that of their family this creates population of silent victims and may discourage the reporting of crimes
  0.000000 con immigration A1 if victims are afraid to come forward to report the crime it could make it easier for crime to happen in those areas
  0.000000 con immigration A1 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
Pros/cons label: 0
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
---------
New section
---------
Brigitte Pawliw-Fry:Isn't everyone a taco hasn't spoken yet about this.
  0.000000 pro microworkers A1 every vote will count in whatever state it is cast
  0.000000 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.000000 pro immigration A2 if police officer has reasonable suspicion to believe witness might be undocumented the officer should not be prohibited from checking that she or he is legal in this country offering reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause
  0.000000 pro immigration A2 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.000000 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
  0.000000 con immigration A2 if witness is afraid to come forward to testify it could result in the perpetrator going free and would undermine the justice system
  0.000000 con immigration A2 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
  0.000000 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
Pros/cons label: 0
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Sam Duffy:Do you want to play devil's advocate for the pros?
  0.987244 con campaignFinanceReform A5 if foreign entities want to make campaign contributions they will find way to do so this proposal would not limit contributions from foreign entities
  0.082581 con immigration A1 if victims are afraid to come forward to report the crime it could make it easier for crime to happen in those areas
  0.016131 pro immigration A2 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  -0.003979 pro immigration A2 if police officer has reasonable suspicion to believe witness might be undocumented the officer should not be prohibited from checking that she or he is legal in this country offering reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause
  -0.008841 con immigration A2 if witness is afraid to come forward to testify it could result in the perpetrator going free and would undermine the justice system
  -0.012323 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
  -0.024498 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  -0.033572 con immigration A2 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
Pros/cons label: 0
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Ronald Pritipaul:No.
  0.000000 pro microworkers A1 every vote will count in whatever state it is cast
  0.000000 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.000000 pro immigration A2 if police officer has reasonable suspicion to believe witness might be undocumented the officer should not be prohibited from checking that she or he is legal in this country offering reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause
  0.000000 pro immigration A2 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.000000 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
  0.000000 con immigration A2 if witness is afraid to come forward to testify it could result in the perpetrator going free and would undermine the justice system
  0.000000 con immigration A2 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
  0.000000 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
Pros/cons label: 0
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Michael Mosle:Yeah, I mean, I think this is pretty much the same case for your incentivizing people to not report. Thanks and fill it seemed like a good idea. So
  0.520524 con campaignFinanceReform A1 corporations are people and have rights to speak and act politically
  0.414609 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.414609 pro immigration A2 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.358958 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.288626 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
  0.077253 con immigration A2 if witness is afraid to come forward to testify it could result in the perpetrator going free and would undermine the justice system
  0.030937 con immigration A2 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
  -0.042485 pro immigration A2 if police officer has reasonable suspicion to believe witness might be undocumented the officer should not be prohibited from checking that she or he is legal in this country offering reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):0
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):1
Brigitte Pawliw-Fry:We can't hear you're at least I can.
  0.000000 pro microworkers A1 every vote will count in whatever state it is cast
  0.000000 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.000000 pro immigration A2 if police officer has reasonable suspicion to believe witness might be undocumented the officer should not be prohibited from checking that she or he is legal in this country offering reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause
  0.000000 pro immigration A2 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.000000 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
  0.000000 con immigration A2 if witness is afraid to come forward to testify it could result in the perpetrator going free and would undermine the justice system
  0.000000 con immigration A2 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
  0.000000 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
Pros/cons label: 0
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Cade May:Those are Trazodone.
  0.000000 pro microworkers A1 every vote will count in whatever state it is cast
  0.000000 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.000000 pro immigration A2 if police officer has reasonable suspicion to believe witness might be undocumented the officer should not be prohibited from checking that she or he is legal in this country offering reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause
  0.000000 pro immigration A2 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.000000 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
  0.000000 con immigration A2 if witness is afraid to come forward to testify it could result in the perpetrator going free and would undermine the justice system
  0.000000 con immigration A2 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
  0.000000 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
Pros/cons label: 0
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Brigitte Pawliw-Fry:I'm typing is coming to help you out with me. And by the way.
  0.653833 pro immigration A3 providing legal counsel could help those going through immigration proceedings be granted judicial relief keeping immigrant families together saves money for the statea taxpayers in increased tax revenues and less need for families left behind to draw on the social safety net
  0.653833 pro immigration A3 providing legal counsel could help those going through immigration proceedings be granted judicial relief keeping immigrant families together saves money for the statea taxpayers in increased tax revenues and less need for families left behind to draw on the social safety net
  0.374292 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.049038 con immigration A2 if witness is afraid to come forward to testify it could result in the perpetrator going free and would undermine the justice system
  0.027997 pro immigration A2 if police officer has reasonable suspicion to believe witness might be undocumented the officer should not be prohibited from checking that she or he is legal in this country offering reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause
  0.005771 pro immigration A2 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  -0.032629 con immigration A2 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
  -0.057566 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Ronald Pritipaul:One thing I'd like to bring up on the side says a pro is better lamentation officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with the local police. I think a local police kind of need to take care of the Community First and by putting them in a situation where they have to ask about the immigration statuses Witnesses in my decrease co-operation instead of increasing cooperation.
  0.914378 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.914378 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.914378 pro immigration A2 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.448825 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.447515 con immigration A2 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
  0.202153 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
  0.055498 pro immigration A2 if police officer has reasonable suspicion to believe witness might be undocumented the officer should not be prohibited from checking that she or he is legal in this country offering reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause
  0.029627 con immigration A2 if witness is afraid to come forward to testify it could result in the perpetrator going free and would undermine the justice system
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):1
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):2
Sydney Shaw:And I think not only decrease co-operation also decrease the level of trust in the justice system as well.
  0.590431 con immigration A2 if witness is afraid to come forward to testify it could result in the perpetrator going free and would undermine the justice system
  0.590431 con immigration A2 if witness is afraid to come forward to testify it could result in the perpetrator going free and would undermine the justice system
  0.313341 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
  0.215118 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.000891 con immigration A2 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
  -0.003935 pro immigration A2 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  -0.047830 pro immigration A2 if police officer has reasonable suspicion to believe witness might be undocumented the officer should not be prohibited from checking that she or he is legal in this country offering reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):1
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):2
Sam Duffy:What kind of protections could be granted to these people so that I can properly testify?
  0.730938 con campaignFinanceReform A1 corporations are people and have rights to speak and act politically
  0.337030 pro immigration A3 providing legal counsel could help those going through immigration proceedings be granted judicial relief keeping immigrant families together saves money for the statea taxpayers in increased tax revenues and less need for families left behind to draw on the social safety net
  0.087767 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.051509 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
  0.048979 con immigration A2 if witness is afraid to come forward to testify it could result in the perpetrator going free and would undermine the justice system
  0.017735 pro immigration A2 if police officer has reasonable suspicion to believe witness might be undocumented the officer should not be prohibited from checking that she or he is legal in this country offering reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause
  0.014987 pro immigration A2 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  -0.008768 con immigration A2 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
Pros/cons label: 0
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Ronald Pritipaul:I think protection is just to not ask about their immigration status. It's not really relevant. So, yeah.
  0.777016 con immigration A1 victims of crimes who are undocumented or have family who are undocumented are often afraid of coming forward because the police could ask about their immigration status or that of their family this creates population of silent victims and may discourage the reporting of crimes
  0.777016 con immigration A1 victims of crimes who are undocumented or have family who are undocumented are often afraid of coming forward because the police could ask about their immigration status or that of their family this creates population of silent victims and may discourage the reporting of crimes
  0.695169 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.455422 con immigration A2 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
  0.431834 pro immigration A2 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.219368 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
  0.156135 pro immigration A2 if police officer has reasonable suspicion to believe witness might be undocumented the officer should not be prohibited from checking that she or he is legal in this country offering reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause
  0.090877 con immigration A2 if witness is afraid to come forward to testify it could result in the perpetrator going free and would undermine the justice system
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):0
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Brigitte Pawliw-Fry:Marion we still can hear you. I don't know if anyone else could hear marry him.
  0.911071 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
  0.911071 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
  0.463311 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
  0.046926 pro immigration A2 if police officer has reasonable suspicion to believe witness might be undocumented the officer should not be prohibited from checking that she or he is legal in this country offering reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause
  0.010592 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  -0.008017 con immigration A2 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
  -0.047277 pro immigration A2 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  -0.065687 con immigration A2 if witness is afraid to come forward to testify it could result in the perpetrator going free and would undermine the justice system
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
---------
New section
---------
Ronald Pritipaul:One reason I'm for financial assistance to undocumented immigrants in court is like this is basin.
  0.838529 pro immigration A4 many undocumented immigrants cannot afford legal assistance and without it do not fare well in immigration court and their liberty is at risk
  0.838529 pro immigration A4 many undocumented immigrants cannot afford legal assistance and without it do not fare well in immigration court and their liberty is at risk
  0.698674 con immigration A3 tax dollars should not be spent on court appointed attorneys and translators to defend undocumented immigrants here illegally
  0.646977 con immigration A3 undocumented immigrants are here illegally and should not have the same rights as citizens or noncitizens here legally
  0.573632 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
  0.000302 pro immigration A3 providing legal counsel could help those going through immigration proceedings be granted judicial relief keeping immigrant families together saves money for the statea taxpayers in increased tax revenues and less need for families left behind to draw on the social safety net
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):1
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Brigitte Pawliw-Fry:Around just refreshing but he'll be back on in.
  0.762940 pro immigration A1 if police officer cannot identify the perpetrator of crime domestic violence where victim fights back in self defense and has probable cause that either party is in the country illegally the officer should be allowed to inquire about the immigration status of all parties
  0.762940 pro immigration A1 if police officer cannot identify the perpetrator of crime domestic violence where victim fights back in self defense and has probable cause that either party is in the country illegally the officer should be allowed to inquire about the immigration status of all parties
  0.091989 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
  0.006793 pro immigration A3 providing legal counsel could help those going through immigration proceedings be granted judicial relief keeping immigrant families together saves money for the statea taxpayers in increased tax revenues and less need for families left behind to draw on the social safety net
  -0.038838 con immigration A3 tax dollars should not be spent on court appointed attorneys and translators to defend undocumented immigrants here illegally
  -0.040993 con immigration A3 undocumented immigrants are here illegally and should not have the same rights as citizens or noncitizens here legally
Pros/cons label: 0
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Ronald Pritipaul:So because the kind of right to a court-appointed counsel as base in kind of a very old president, it shouldn't be tied to citizenship.
  0.802853 con microworkers A2 candidates who are troubled by the cost of campaigns can always choose to observe their own limits if candidates choose not to employ voluntary spending limits that is their right
  0.408098 pro immigration A3 providing legal counsel could help those going through immigration proceedings be granted judicial relief keeping immigrant families together saves money for the statea taxpayers in increased tax revenues and less need for families left behind to draw on the social safety net
  0.005008 con immigration A3 tax dollars should not be spent on court appointed attorneys and translators to defend undocumented immigrants here illegally
  -0.004337 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
  -0.029756 con immigration A3 undocumented immigrants are here illegally and should not have the same rights as citizens or noncitizens here legally
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):1
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Sam Duffy:I think it's morally it's important to just have the ability to have console for everybody.
  0.949307 pro microworkers A2 it is important for candidates running for office to spend on their campaigns but limits should be set on how much they should be allowed to spend this would level the playing field for all campaigns
  0.037478 con immigration A1 if victims are afraid to come forward to report the crime it could make it easier for crime to happen in those areas
  0.005952 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
  0.000015 pro immigration A3 providing legal counsel could help those going through immigration proceedings be granted judicial relief keeping immigrant families together saves money for the statea taxpayers in increased tax revenues and less need for families left behind to draw on the social safety net
  -0.001411 con immigration A3 tax dollars should not be spent on court appointed attorneys and translators to defend undocumented immigrants here illegally
  -0.013312 con immigration A3 undocumented immigrants are here illegally and should not have the same rights as citizens or noncitizens here legally
Pros/cons label: 0
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):1
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):

Sam Duffy:We've been just kind of find me a general conversation over over in this area a while. Everything was down here is kind of talking about yet just really important to have console in any case scenario on the movie on tonight. Do you like what if someone's a gang member just kind of want to hear thoughts on that?
  0.500303 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
  0.500303 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
  0.127803 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
  0.048979 pro immigration A3 providing legal counsel could help those going through immigration proceedings be granted judicial relief keeping immigrant families together saves money for the statea taxpayers in increased tax revenues and less need for families left behind to draw on the social safety net
  0.005897 con immigration A3 tax dollars should not be spent on court appointed attorneys and translators to defend undocumented immigrants here illegally
  -0.092757 con immigration A3 undocumented immigrants are here illegally and should not have the same rights as citizens or noncitizens here legally
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):0
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Ronald Pritipaul:I think we should limit the discussion to the people in our group because we're trying to test the moderating thing.
  0.666485 con campaignFinanceReform A5 if foreign entities want to make campaign contributions they will find way to do so this proposal would not limit contributions from foreign entities
  0.153088 con immigration A3 undocumented immigrants are here illegally and should not have the same rights as citizens or noncitizens here legally
  0.024430 pro immigration A3 providing legal counsel could help those going through immigration proceedings be granted judicial relief keeping immigrant families together saves money for the statea taxpayers in increased tax revenues and less need for families left behind to draw on the social safety net
  -0.046327 con immigration A3 tax dollars should not be spent on court appointed attorneys and translators to defend undocumented immigrants here illegally
  -0.070975 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Sam Duffy:They're all in the group.
  0.000000 pro microworkers A1 every vote will count in whatever state it is cast
  0.000000 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.000000 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
  0.000000 pro immigration A3 providing legal counsel could help those going through immigration proceedings be granted judicial relief keeping immigrant families together saves money for the statea taxpayers in increased tax revenues and less need for families left behind to draw on the social safety net
  0.000000 con immigration A3 undocumented immigrants are here illegally and should not have the same rights as citizens or noncitizens here legally
  0.000000 con immigration A3 tax dollars should not be spent on court appointed attorneys and translators to defend undocumented immigrants here illegally
Pros/cons label: 0
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Cade May:a free 21 Savage man
  0.912158 con campaignFinanceReform A4 such mandatory disclosures may raise free speech concerns
  0.624550 con immigration A2 if witness is afraid to come forward to testify it could result in the perpetrator going free and would undermine the justice system
  0.081463 con immigration A3 tax dollars should not be spent on court appointed attorneys and translators to defend undocumented immigrants here illegally
  -0.023871 pro immigration A3 providing legal counsel could help those going through immigration proceedings be granted judicial relief keeping immigrant families together saves money for the statea taxpayers in increased tax revenues and less need for families left behind to draw on the social safety net
  -0.068070 con immigration A3 undocumented immigrants are here illegally and should not have the same rights as citizens or noncitizens here legally
  -0.116968 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
Pros/cons label: 0
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Brigitte Pawliw-Fry:I don't think their status as gang member or not is contingent with it when weather is like they deserve cancel.
  0.853266 pro campaignFinanceReform A2 the status quo discourages grassroots and or third party candidates
  0.568373 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  0.060598 con immigration A3 tax dollars should not be spent on court appointed attorneys and translators to defend undocumented immigrants here illegally
  0.009619 pro immigration A3 providing legal counsel could help those going through immigration proceedings be granted judicial relief keeping immigrant families together saves money for the statea taxpayers in increased tax revenues and less need for families left behind to draw on the social safety net
  -0.015014 con immigration A3 undocumented immigrants are here illegally and should not have the same rights as citizens or noncitizens here legally
  -0.125770 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
Pros/cons label: 0
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):0
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):1
Ronald Pritipaul:And also the definition of a gang is like very kind of it's not really like something we can really pinpoint. There's been many times in American history where groups that are activist groups were labeled as gangs to justify their like a eradication and like
  0.738045 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.738045 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.015406 pro immigration A3 providing legal counsel could help those going through immigration proceedings be granted judicial relief keeping immigrant families together saves money for the statea taxpayers in increased tax revenues and less need for families left behind to draw on the social safety net
  -0.013658 con immigration A3 tax dollars should not be spent on court appointed attorneys and translators to defend undocumented immigrants here illegally
  -0.015650 con immigration A3 undocumented immigrants are here illegally and should not have the same rights as citizens or noncitizens here legally
  -0.016044 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
Pros/cons label: 0
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Sydney Shaw:I think that if we're defining factors of having Council be open to everyone then we can't live in it to gang members because last person just said then you have to define those parameters.
  0.946887 pro immigration A5 it is in the national interest as testified by members of the national security community to determine who is residing in the be it lawfully or unlawfully in order to create database for law enforcement purposes
  0.946887 pro immigration A5 it is in the national interest as testified by members of the national security community to determine who is residing in the be it lawfully or unlawfully in order to create database for law enforcement purposes
  0.022730 con immigration A3 tax dollars should not be spent on court appointed attorneys and translators to defend undocumented immigrants here illegally
  0.002118 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
  -0.009907 con immigration A3 undocumented immigrants are here illegally and should not have the same rights as citizens or noncitizens here legally
  -0.012690 pro immigration A3 providing legal counsel could help those going through immigration proceedings be granted judicial relief keeping immigrant families together saves money for the statea taxpayers in increased tax revenues and less need for families left behind to draw on the social safety net
Pros/cons label: 0
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Ronald Pritipaul:If we were to kind of limited financial assistance to undocumented gang members that goes against the justice system because it gives certain groups unfair advantage and that undermines the idea of a fair trial and speedy trial for everyone. Not just the people who are suspected of being in gangs.
  0.531321 pro campaignFinanceReform A2 the status quo discourages grassroots and or third party candidates
  0.500606 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.345713 con immigration A3 undocumented immigrants are here illegally and should not have the same rights as citizens or noncitizens here legally
  0.334801 con immigration A3 tax dollars should not be spent on court appointed attorneys and translators to defend undocumented immigrants here illegally
  0.242268 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
  0.079073 pro immigration A3 providing legal counsel could help those going through immigration proceedings be granted judicial relief keeping immigrant families together saves money for the statea taxpayers in increased tax revenues and less need for families left behind to draw on the social safety net
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):1
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
---------
New section
---------
Ronald Pritipaul:Call local government shouldn't be obligated to fund nonprofits for Legal Services. Maybe if they do it for a lot of other groups, but that should be up to the citizens of each local government and not kind of a hard and fast rule also doesn't make sense in some jurisdictions.
  0.595912 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.595912 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.380611 con immigration A4 immigration is federal law and should not be up to the states to fund attorneys for undocumented immigrants
  0.291016 con immigration A4 funds are drawing tax dollars away from american citizens and legal resident aliens in need tax money should be to provide for citizens and legal resident aliens and not to prolong the stay of undocumented immigrants
  0.060767 pro immigration A4 many undocumented immigrants cannot afford legal assistance and without it do not fare well in immigration court and their liberty is at risk
  0.040000 pro immigration A4 not being able to afford legal services in immigration proceedings could result in unnecessary deportation this could split families apart and could place undue burdens on families and even the tax payers should children have to end up as wards of the state
  -0.006329 pro immigration A4 without legal assistance many immigrants are often unaware of how their rights can be defended
  -0.011728 con immigration A4 immigration proceedings might be civil matters and no americans who are defending themselves in civil proceedings are entitled to taxpayer funded representation therefore undocumented immigrants should not be entitled to such services
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):0
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):1
Sam Duffy:Definitely a case-by-case basis.
  0.000000 pro microworkers A1 every vote will count in whatever state it is cast
  0.000000 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.000000 pro immigration A4 without legal assistance many immigrants are often unaware of how their rights can be defended
  0.000000 pro immigration A4 many undocumented immigrants cannot afford legal assistance and without it do not fare well in immigration court and their liberty is at risk
  0.000000 pro immigration A4 not being able to afford legal services in immigration proceedings could result in unnecessary deportation this could split families apart and could place undue burdens on families and even the tax payers should children have to end up as wards of the state
  0.000000 con immigration A4 immigration is federal law and should not be up to the states to fund attorneys for undocumented immigrants
  0.000000 con immigration A4 funds are drawing tax dollars away from american citizens and legal resident aliens in need tax money should be to provide for citizens and legal resident aliens and not to prolong the stay of undocumented immigrants
  0.000000 con immigration A4 immigration proceedings might be civil matters and no americans who are defending themselves in civil proceedings are entitled to taxpayer funded representation therefore undocumented immigrants should not be entitled to such services
Pros/cons label: 0
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Ronald Pritipaul:Your mic is getting feedback. So I may be gypsum headphones or something or
  0.841675 pro campaignFinanceReform A2 the status quo discourages grassroots and or third party candidates
  0.342300 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.134749 con immigration A4 immigration proceedings might be civil matters and no americans who are defending themselves in civil proceedings are entitled to taxpayer funded representation therefore undocumented immigrants should not be entitled to such services
  0.058533 con immigration A4 immigration is federal law and should not be up to the states to fund attorneys for undocumented immigrants
  0.029535 pro immigration A4 many undocumented immigrants cannot afford legal assistance and without it do not fare well in immigration court and their liberty is at risk
  -0.009008 pro immigration A4 not being able to afford legal services in immigration proceedings could result in unnecessary deportation this could split families apart and could place undue burdens on families and even the tax payers should children have to end up as wards of the state
  -0.046575 con immigration A4 funds are drawing tax dollars away from american citizens and legal resident aliens in need tax money should be to provide for citizens and legal resident aliens and not to prolong the stay of undocumented immigrants
  -0.074239 pro immigration A4 without legal assistance many immigrants are often unaware of how their rights can be defended
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
---------
New section
---------
Ronald Pritipaul:I believe in a path to citizenship for those who haven't committed any crimes because although there is pads to legally become a resident of the United States when she came here undocumented. It's very political question. The way we Define a refugee or an asylum-seeker is based off of the u.s. Is strategic like International goals, my mother immigrated to the United States because of ethnic violence in political violence in the home country of Guyana, but because the dictatorship is backed by the United States would intervene are considered Refugee and Asylum.
  0.568328 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  0.568328 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  0.562668 pro immigration A5 creating legal options for those who have been in the country over long period of time without committing other crimes will put them on path through to citizenship without the fear of being deported
  0.437218 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
  0.330869 con immigration A5 providing pathways to citizenship and legalization rewards illegal immigrants and disrespects those who have come to the country legally
  0.313890 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
  -0.001919 pro immigration A5 it is in the national interest as testified by members of the national security community to determine who is residing in the be it lawfully or unlawfully in order to create database for law enforcement purposes
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):1
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):1
Sam Duffy:Michael kader Sydney anything ins
  0.000000 pro microworkers A1 every vote will count in whatever state it is cast
  0.000000 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.000000 pro immigration A5 creating legal options for those who have been in the country over long period of time without committing other crimes will put them on path through to citizenship without the fear of being deported
  0.000000 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
  0.000000 pro immigration A5 it is in the national interest as testified by members of the national security community to determine who is residing in the be it lawfully or unlawfully in order to create database for law enforcement purposes
  0.000000 con immigration A5 providing pathways to citizenship and legalization rewards illegal immigrants and disrespects those who have come to the country legally
  0.000000 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  0.000000 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
Pros/cons label: 0
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Sam Duffy:Is this a little better?
  0.000000 pro microworkers A1 every vote will count in whatever state it is cast
  0.000000 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.000000 pro immigration A5 creating legal options for those who have been in the country over long period of time without committing other crimes will put them on path through to citizenship without the fear of being deported
  0.000000 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
  0.000000 pro immigration A5 it is in the national interest as testified by members of the national security community to determine who is residing in the be it lawfully or unlawfully in order to create database for law enforcement purposes
  0.000000 con immigration A5 providing pathways to citizenship and legalization rewards illegal immigrants and disrespects those who have come to the country legally
  0.000000 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  0.000000 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
Pros/cons label: 0
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Brigitte Pawliw-Fry:These are the things better and I don't agree with Ron that conceptions of like who is an immigrant or totally socially contingent and have changed historically. So it's important that there are pasta citizenship not just based on which immigrants we see as worthwhile is done during country, but for all
  0.703375 pro campaignFinanceReform A2 the status quo discourages grassroots and or third party candidates
  0.494300 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.468682 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  0.288073 pro immigration A5 creating legal options for those who have been in the country over long period of time without committing other crimes will put them on path through to citizenship without the fear of being deported
  0.253684 con immigration A5 providing pathways to citizenship and legalization rewards illegal immigrants and disrespects those who have come to the country legally
  0.169620 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
  0.147440 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
  -0.042051 pro immigration A5 it is in the national interest as testified by members of the national security community to determine who is residing in the be it lawfully or unlawfully in order to create database for law enforcement purposes
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):1
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Sam Duffy:Discuss the providing Pathways to citizenship and legalization report illegal immigrants and disrespects those who come to our country illegally.
  0.927087 con immigration A5 providing pathways to citizenship and legalization rewards illegal immigrants and disrespects those who have come to the country legally
  0.927087 con immigration A5 providing pathways to citizenship and legalization rewards illegal immigrants and disrespects those who have come to the country legally
  0.813899 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  0.453483 pro immigration A5 creating legal options for those who have been in the country over long period of time without committing other crimes will put them on path through to citizenship without the fear of being deported
  0.320709 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
  0.069110 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
  -0.017902 pro immigration A5 it is in the national interest as testified by members of the national security community to determine who is residing in the be it lawfully or unlawfully in order to create database for law enforcement purposes
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):0
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):1
Brigitte Pawliw-Fry:I mean, I think this content is does not recognize like why people are immigrating like obviously there's a lot of turmoil created by the US and a lot of countries. There's a lot of destabilization, let it happen and sort of saying this is saying that Americans are good because they had the opportunity born here and then illegal immigrants are bad because they were trying to flee that's to let me know if you can generalize in all cases, but I think this is like a bad premise.
  0.581115 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.581115 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.444196 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  0.296818 con immigration A5 providing pathways to citizenship and legalization rewards illegal immigrants and disrespects those who have come to the country legally
  0.149441 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
  0.141945 pro immigration A5 creating legal options for those who have been in the country over long period of time without committing other crimes will put them on path through to citizenship without the fear of being deported
  0.052064 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
  -0.006161 pro immigration A5 it is in the national interest as testified by members of the national security community to determine who is residing in the be it lawfully or unlawfully in order to create database for law enforcement purposes
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):0
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):1
Sam Duffy:No, I'm not talking about people who are born here and talk about people who long Winters actual legal process. He's North Bend United States without enter illegally.
  0.576924 pro immigration A5 creating legal options for those who have been in the country over long period of time without committing other crimes will put them on path through to citizenship without the fear of being deported
  0.576924 pro immigration A5 creating legal options for those who have been in the country over long period of time without committing other crimes will put them on path through to citizenship without the fear of being deported
  0.293139 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  0.260237 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
  0.231633 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
  0.127369 con immigration A5 providing pathways to citizenship and legalization rewards illegal immigrants and disrespects those who have come to the country legally
  0.044466 pro immigration A5 it is in the national interest as testified by members of the national security community to determine who is residing in the be it lawfully or unlawfully in order to create database for law enforcement purposes
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Ronald Pritipaul:How many ways argument still holds up because it's kind of defined as America as a government seize as like a valid resident or a valid prison to stay in the United States and I think like that changes would like Federal governments and like different administrations. And so having a 10-year. That's like to present like three presidential terms and it kind of safeguards against like discrimination based off like origin.
  0.796406 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.796406 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.177469 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  0.133738 pro immigration A5 creating legal options for those who have been in the country over long period of time without committing other crimes will put them on path through to citizenship without the fear of being deported
  0.116612 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
  -0.022320 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
  -0.050107 con immigration A5 providing pathways to citizenship and legalization rewards illegal immigrants and disrespects those who have come to the country legally
  -0.094197 pro immigration A5 it is in the national interest as testified by members of the national security community to determine who is residing in the be it lawfully or unlawfully in order to create database for law enforcement purposes
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):1
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Sam Duffy:What do you think Michael?
  0.000000 pro microworkers A1 every vote will count in whatever state it is cast
  0.000000 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.000000 pro immigration A5 creating legal options for those who have been in the country over long period of time without committing other crimes will put them on path through to citizenship without the fear of being deported
  0.000000 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
  0.000000 pro immigration A5 it is in the national interest as testified by members of the national security community to determine who is residing in the be it lawfully or unlawfully in order to create database for law enforcement purposes
  0.000000 con immigration A5 providing pathways to citizenship and legalization rewards illegal immigrants and disrespects those who have come to the country legally
  0.000000 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  0.000000 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
Pros/cons label: 0
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Michael Mosle:Yeah, I mean, I honestly kind of also have some issues with the wording of the question because it's like they point out. The one fact that the Immigrant has not made any serious crime for the past 10 years and it's like almost to like that's expected that they would commit some crime within 10 years then if they can do that that's like an automatic entrance to citizenship and so like it's it's difficult and I am hesitant taking all because I think that it's worded poorly from the beginning.
  0.659203 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.659203 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.421274 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
  0.306744 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  0.195734 pro immigration A5 creating legal options for those who have been in the country over long period of time without committing other crimes will put them on path through to citizenship without the fear of being deported
  0.024951 con immigration A5 providing pathways to citizenship and legalization rewards illegal immigrants and disrespects those who have come to the country legally
  0.005135 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
  -0.055909 pro immigration A5 it is in the national interest as testified by members of the national security community to determine who is residing in the be it lawfully or unlawfully in order to create database for law enforcement purposes
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Sam Duffy:I agree with that sentiment.
  0.000000 pro microworkers A1 every vote will count in whatever state it is cast
  0.000000 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.000000 pro immigration A5 creating legal options for those who have been in the country over long period of time without committing other crimes will put them on path through to citizenship without the fear of being deported
  0.000000 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
  0.000000 pro immigration A5 it is in the national interest as testified by members of the national security community to determine who is residing in the be it lawfully or unlawfully in order to create database for law enforcement purposes
  0.000000 con immigration A5 providing pathways to citizenship and legalization rewards illegal immigrants and disrespects those who have come to the country legally
  0.000000 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  0.000000 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
Pros/cons label: 0
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Brigitte Pawliw-Fry:Michael sorry, could you just clarify what you said around the way it's worded. I just miss him.
  0.987244 con campaignFinanceReform A5 if foreign entities want to make campaign contributions they will find way to do so this proposal would not limit contributions from foreign entities
  0.082581 con immigration A1 if victims are afraid to come forward to report the crime it could make it easier for crime to happen in those areas
  0.079651 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
  0.049681 pro immigration A5 it is in the national interest as testified by members of the national security community to determine who is residing in the be it lawfully or unlawfully in order to create database for law enforcement purposes
  0.024321 pro immigration A5 creating legal options for those who have been in the country over long period of time without committing other crimes will put them on path through to citizenship without the fear of being deported
  0.009905 con immigration A5 providing pathways to citizenship and legalization rewards illegal immigrants and disrespects those who have come to the country legally
  -0.000818 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
  -0.009623 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
Pros/cons label: 0
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Michael Mosle:It just kind of it seemed to me like they were they on. Basically are saying that if if someone can be in the country for 10 years without doing a serious crime, I guess that makes sense that they are functioning citizen, but it it just the way that it's saying I should almost be like an exception for an undocumented immigrant and therefore like these special cases. Should there be be allowed to have legal options? Like I take issue with that probably a lot of a document so you can go for taking some smaller.
  0.552146 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.552146 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.547440 pro immigration A5 creating legal options for those who have been in the country over long period of time without committing other crimes will put them on path through to citizenship without the fear of being deported
  0.451813 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
  0.389269 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  0.334410 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
  0.214269 con immigration A5 providing pathways to citizenship and legalization rewards illegal immigrants and disrespects those who have come to the country legally
  0.082198 pro immigration A5 it is in the national interest as testified by members of the national security community to determine who is residing in the be it lawfully or unlawfully in order to create database for law enforcement purposes
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Ronald Pritipaul:I will lose out on like income tax and other like taxation things when we don't provide undocumented immigrants a path to citizenship special you like those have been here for so long. Money is like in the economy and is not going to support infrastructure. So I think that's another reason to support a pack of citizen.
  0.599197 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.599197 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.456602 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
  0.257393 pro immigration A5 creating legal options for those who have been in the country over long period of time without committing other crimes will put them on path through to citizenship without the fear of being deported
  0.221509 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  0.199650 con immigration A5 providing pathways to citizenship and legalization rewards illegal immigrants and disrespects those who have come to the country legally
  0.150740 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
  0.054214 pro immigration A5 it is in the national interest as testified by members of the national security community to determine who is residing in the be it lawfully or unlawfully in order to create database for law enforcement purposes
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):1
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):2
Ronald Pritipaul:I think we should abolish ice not just like the administration but like the solid state of water think that should be something.
  0.757664 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.757664 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.013211 pro immigration A5 creating legal options for those who have been in the country over long period of time without committing other crimes will put them on path through to citizenship without the fear of being deported
  0.008865 con immigration A5 providing pathways to citizenship and legalization rewards illegal immigrants and disrespects those who have come to the country legally
  -0.011613 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
  -0.022686 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
  -0.040112 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  -0.098223 pro immigration A5 it is in the national interest as testified by members of the national security community to determine who is residing in the be it lawfully or unlawfully in order to create database for law enforcement purposes
Pros/cons label: 0
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
---------
New section
---------
Veena Agusala:Okay. I know you guys all have opinions on this but you guys have anything so I think it is should be okay for a police officer to inquire about the immigration status of victims of crime on Reasonable Suspicion, and now every other people days off.
  0.684392 pro immigration A1 if police officer cannot identify the perpetrator of crime domestic violence where victim fights back in self defense and has probable cause that either party is in the country illegally the officer should be allowed to inquire about the immigration status of all parties
  0.684392 pro immigration A1 if police officer cannot identify the perpetrator of crime domestic violence where victim fights back in self defense and has probable cause that either party is in the country illegally the officer should be allowed to inquire about the immigration status of all parties
  0.607671 con immigration A1 victims of crimes who are undocumented or have family who are undocumented are often afraid of coming forward because the police could ask about their immigration status or that of their family this creates population of silent victims and may discourage the reporting of crimes
  0.541991 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.507193 con immigration A1 if victims are afraid to come forward to report the crime it could make it easier for crime to happen in those areas
  0.248498 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.230504 con immigration A1 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):1
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):1
Skyler Castillo-Wilson:I think Reasonable Suspicion attached to make a sound like an undocumented immigrant situation is very subjective. Especially suspicious of anybody else.
  0.684112 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.684112 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.574510 con immigration A1 victims of crimes who are undocumented or have family who are undocumented are often afraid of coming forward because the police could ask about their immigration status or that of their family this creates population of silent victims and may discourage the reporting of crimes
  0.496188 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.362188 con immigration A1 if victims are afraid to come forward to report the crime it could make it easier for crime to happen in those areas
  0.167577 pro immigration A1 if police officer cannot identify the perpetrator of crime domestic violence where victim fights back in self defense and has probable cause that either party is in the country illegally the officer should be allowed to inquire about the immigration status of all parties
  0.033809 con immigration A1 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):0
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):3
Cade Cannedy:Yes, backing off the same point Reasonable Suspicion is a concept has been used by police for decades to harassing your communities and minorities in particular.
  0.595224 pro campaignFinanceReform A2 the status quo discourages grassroots and or third party candidates
  0.462179 con immigration A1 victims of crimes who are undocumented or have family who are undocumented are often afraid of coming forward because the police could ask about their immigration status or that of their family this creates population of silent victims and may discourage the reporting of crimes
  0.445340 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.394057 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.383601 pro immigration A1 if police officer cannot identify the perpetrator of crime domestic violence where victim fights back in self defense and has probable cause that either party is in the country illegally the officer should be allowed to inquire about the immigration status of all parties
  0.101578 con immigration A1 if victims are afraid to come forward to report the crime it could make it easier for crime to happen in those areas
  0.061449 con immigration A1 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):0
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):3
Toni Adeyemi:Yeah, I agree that backing off the Cadence College Point. Also just the fact that like regionals this business out objective and there's so much bias within just people in general. Just play some people and just within their ability to make this judgment in a situation. I don't think should be given to any person. Also it may stop people from reporting crimes and they think that they are eligible to be asked about this and then that could increase crime in other places.
  0.651263 pro campaignFinanceReform A2 the status quo discourages grassroots and or third party candidates
  0.567510 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.431198 con immigration A1 victims of crimes who are undocumented or have family who are undocumented are often afraid of coming forward because the police could ask about their immigration status or that of their family this creates population of silent victims and may discourage the reporting of crimes
  0.269778 con immigration A1 if victims are afraid to come forward to report the crime it could make it easier for crime to happen in those areas
  0.124170 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.121502 pro immigration A1 if police officer cannot identify the perpetrator of crime domestic violence where victim fights back in self defense and has probable cause that either party is in the country illegally the officer should be allowed to inquire about the immigration status of all parties
  0.100220 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.036363 con immigration A1 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):0
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):2
Toni Adeyemi:Yeah, that's a really good point. And I also think that like if we think about how immigration is produced train like Media or our policy current local environment, like there are certain groups that are portrayed as immigrants more than other groups. And I think they were just completely unfairly targeted groups that are historically known for having higher population on welfare. A lot of people that are already, they persecuted in other situations.
  0.693520 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.693520 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.265354 con immigration A1 victims of crimes who are undocumented or have family who are undocumented are often afraid of coming forward because the police could ask about their immigration status or that of their family this creates population of silent victims and may discourage the reporting of crimes
  0.262755 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.248541 con immigration A1 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
  0.082775 pro immigration A1 if police officer cannot identify the perpetrator of crime domestic violence where victim fights back in self defense and has probable cause that either party is in the country illegally the officer should be allowed to inquire about the immigration status of all parties
  0.013621 con immigration A1 if victims are afraid to come forward to report the crime it could make it easier for crime to happen in those areas
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):0
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
---------
New section
---------
Cade Cannedy:Yeah, one of my big concerns for this would be the chilling effect that it would have on people report a crime. I would be concerned that people who are illegal immigrants would not be allowed to report crimes for fear of Retribution from police in terms of like their inquiries about immigration status.
  0.601040 con immigration A1 victims of crimes who are undocumented or have family who are undocumented are often afraid of coming forward because the police could ask about their immigration status or that of their family this creates population of silent victims and may discourage the reporting of crimes
  0.601040 con immigration A1 victims of crimes who are undocumented or have family who are undocumented are often afraid of coming forward because the police could ask about their immigration status or that of their family this creates population of silent victims and may discourage the reporting of crimes
  0.435889 pro immigration A2 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.427612 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.265372 con immigration A2 if witness is afraid to come forward to testify it could result in the perpetrator going free and would undermine the justice system
  0.211723 pro immigration A2 if police officer has reasonable suspicion to believe witness might be undocumented the officer should not be prohibited from checking that she or he is legal in this country offering reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause
  0.189264 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
  0.143647 con immigration A2 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):0
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):3
Skyler Castillo-Wilson:I think the for my experience at in some way is already the case in New Mexico. It certainly seemed a little bit of that.
  0.778287 con alicesClass A6 offering vouchers would not draw in people that were not already interested in the campaign process this would not change the existing campaign process
  0.486109 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
  0.068992 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
  0.035915 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.024503 pro immigration A2 if police officer has reasonable suspicion to believe witness might be undocumented the officer should not be prohibited from checking that she or he is legal in this country offering reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause
  0.004415 con immigration A2 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
  -0.000815 pro immigration A2 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  -0.115975 con immigration A2 if witness is afraid to come forward to testify it could result in the perpetrator going free and would undermine the justice system
Pros/cons label: 0
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Toni Adeyemi:Your thing isn't working your microphone.
  0.000000 pro microworkers A1 every vote will count in whatever state it is cast
  0.000000 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.000000 pro immigration A2 if police officer has reasonable suspicion to believe witness might be undocumented the officer should not be prohibited from checking that she or he is legal in this country offering reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause
  0.000000 pro immigration A2 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.000000 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
  0.000000 con immigration A2 if witness is afraid to come forward to testify it could result in the perpetrator going free and would undermine the justice system
  0.000000 con immigration A2 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
  0.000000 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
Pros/cons label: 0
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
---------
New section
---------
Dante Laird:I think this is a question obviously, but I think because I just like to have been in the country for a certain. Of time and like they've done nothing wrong for contributing and because
  0.568443 pro campaignFinanceReform A2 the status quo discourages grassroots and or third party candidates
  0.556065 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.098530 pro immigration A3 providing legal counsel could help those going through immigration proceedings be granted judicial relief keeping immigrant families together saves money for the statea taxpayers in increased tax revenues and less need for families left behind to draw on the social safety net
  -0.032539 con immigration A3 undocumented immigrants are here illegally and should not have the same rights as citizens or noncitizens here legally
  -0.050027 con immigration A3 tax dollars should not be spent on court appointed attorneys and translators to defend undocumented immigrants here illegally
  -0.062773 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
Pros/cons label: 0
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Skyler Castillo-Wilson:Yeah, I agree. We've kind of seen that so far as like em has actually been happening has been a quite a few nonprofits that popped up that provide financial help to undocumented immigrants are looking for like a legal path to citizenship that can travel word for if it's can show that could be effective in somewhere.
  0.673841 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
  0.673841 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
  0.552884 con immigration A3 undocumented immigrants are here illegally and should not have the same rights as citizens or noncitizens here legally
  0.550474 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
  0.428746 con immigration A3 tax dollars should not be spent on court appointed attorneys and translators to defend undocumented immigrants here illegally
  0.309366 pro immigration A3 providing legal counsel could help those going through immigration proceedings be granted judicial relief keeping immigrant families together saves money for the statea taxpayers in increased tax revenues and less need for families left behind to draw on the social safety net
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):1
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Melda Alaluf:I think I agree with both points. I do have to say though that I think that people should be afforded legal counsel regardless of their history in the country because I just think that access to access to justice is sort of requirement.
  0.514932 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
  0.514932 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
  0.432018 pro immigration A3 providing legal counsel could help those going through immigration proceedings be granted judicial relief keeping immigrant families together saves money for the statea taxpayers in increased tax revenues and less need for families left behind to draw on the social safety net
  0.264608 con immigration A3 undocumented immigrants are here illegally and should not have the same rights as citizens or noncitizens here legally
  0.248152 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
  0.025290 con immigration A3 tax dollars should not be spent on court appointed attorneys and translators to defend undocumented immigrants here illegally
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):1
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Cade Cannedy:Yeah, I think I kind of the same thing on that equal access to Justice and something that I would want. If I were a migrant sling sling persecution and economic conditions that are largely out of my control, I would want all of the support of the system to to help me on that on my pass em, and I think that's a reasonable expectation that anyone in that situation would have access to legal counsel is necessary to negotiate an increasingly complex system.
  0.639231 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.639231 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.327301 pro immigration A3 providing legal counsel could help those going through immigration proceedings be granted judicial relief keeping immigrant families together saves money for the statea taxpayers in increased tax revenues and less need for families left behind to draw on the social safety net
  0.235383 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
  0.092448 con immigration A3 tax dollars should not be spent on court appointed attorneys and translators to defend undocumented immigrants here illegally
  0.006501 con immigration A3 undocumented immigrants are here illegally and should not have the same rights as citizens or noncitizens here legally
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):1
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):2
Toni Adeyemi:I don't really have a strong opinion on this as I do other things cuz I agree and I and II. Agreed I think everyone deserves equal access to like a court-appointed lawyers that usually these things are so complicated. Like I'm one thing that I like em, like not sure about is like having people's like them on like the tax dollars being spent by people who Does tax dollars being spent on it because I'm like trying to think about. I don't know like I guess I'll say it. I meant I'm going I don't know. I have a thought.
  0.737766 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.737766 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.377043 con immigration A3 tax dollars should not be spent on court appointed attorneys and translators to defend undocumented immigrants here illegally
  0.289922 pro immigration A3 providing legal counsel could help those going through immigration proceedings be granted judicial relief keeping immigrant families together saves money for the statea taxpayers in increased tax revenues and less need for families left behind to draw on the social safety net
  0.174201 con immigration A3 undocumented immigrants are here illegally and should not have the same rights as citizens or noncitizens here legally
  0.048097 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):0
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):2
Dominique Reliford:I think there's a miss that undocumented people don't pay taxes, but very often they do so like not like asking attack on like
  0.662015 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.662015 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.394140 con immigration A3 undocumented immigrants are here illegally and should not have the same rights as citizens or noncitizens here legally
  0.392284 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
  0.176836 con immigration A3 tax dollars should not be spent on court appointed attorneys and translators to defend undocumented immigrants here illegally
  0.068895 pro immigration A3 providing legal counsel could help those going through immigration proceedings be granted judicial relief keeping immigrant families together saves money for the statea taxpayers in increased tax revenues and less need for families left behind to draw on the social safety net
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):
 
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Dante Laird:3.5 no idea what kind of bike is like the tax dollars in like two because of like there was no
  0.748874 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.748874 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.349937 con immigration A3 tax dollars should not be spent on court appointed attorneys and translators to defend undocumented immigrants here illegally
  0.284345 pro immigration A3 providing legal counsel could help those going through immigration proceedings be granted judicial relief keeping immigrant families together saves money for the statea taxpayers in increased tax revenues and less need for families left behind to draw on the social safety net
  0.191215 con immigration A3 undocumented immigrants are here illegally and should not have the same rights as citizens or noncitizens here legally
  -0.010179 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Toni Adeyemi:agreed
  0.000000 pro microworkers A1 every vote will count in whatever state it is cast
  0.000000 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.000000 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
  0.000000 pro immigration A3 providing legal counsel could help those going through immigration proceedings be granted judicial relief keeping immigrant families together saves money for the statea taxpayers in increased tax revenues and less need for families left behind to draw on the social safety net
  0.000000 con immigration A3 undocumented immigrants are here illegally and should not have the same rights as citizens or noncitizens here legally
  0.000000 con immigration A3 tax dollars should not be spent on court appointed attorneys and translators to defend undocumented immigrants here illegally
Pros/cons label: 0
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Cade Cannedy:Something that I would be in favor of my tax dollars going towards it would be helping people from from disadvantaged backgrounds negotiate a very complex system. Um, I think there's a good I think we can point to a good use of taxpayer funds it would be something like this to help people who are who don't have those resources themselves negotiate the system I think is is imperative that we fish.
  0.538612 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
  0.538612 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
  0.494824 pro immigration A3 providing legal counsel could help those going through immigration proceedings be granted judicial relief keeping immigrant families together saves money for the statea taxpayers in increased tax revenues and less need for families left behind to draw on the social safety net
  0.364442 con immigration A3 undocumented immigrants are here illegally and should not have the same rights as citizens or noncitizens here legally
  0.333718 con immigration A3 tax dollars should not be spent on court appointed attorneys and translators to defend undocumented immigrants here illegally
  0.276557 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):1
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):1
Nya Hughes:This word. Can you hear me? The news that was actually like more cost-effective to help people and their families together than to try to separate them.
  0.759515 pro immigration A3 providing legal counsel could help those going through immigration proceedings be granted judicial relief keeping immigrant families together saves money for the statea taxpayers in increased tax revenues and less need for families left behind to draw on the social safety net
  0.759515 pro immigration A3 providing legal counsel could help those going through immigration proceedings be granted judicial relief keeping immigrant families together saves money for the statea taxpayers in increased tax revenues and less need for families left behind to draw on the social safety net
  0.004871 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
  -0.002058 con immigration A3 undocumented immigrants are here illegally and should not have the same rights as citizens or noncitizens here legally
  -0.018310 con immigration A3 tax dollars should not be spent on court appointed attorneys and translators to defend undocumented immigrants here illegally
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):1
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):2
---------
New section
---------
Skyler Castillo-Wilson:I think like more so this than even the previous question in that a local nonprofit like is going to reflect the needs of its community and its specific undocumented migrants more specifically than the entire federal government. And so maybe doing it local level will be even more effective.
  0.896414 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.896414 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.552917 con immigration A4 immigration is federal law and should not be up to the states to fund attorneys for undocumented immigrants
  0.240310 pro immigration A4 not being able to afford legal services in immigration proceedings could result in unnecessary deportation this could split families apart and could place undue burdens on families and even the tax payers should children have to end up as wards of the state
  0.163816 con immigration A4 immigration proceedings might be civil matters and no americans who are defending themselves in civil proceedings are entitled to taxpayer funded representation therefore undocumented immigrants should not be entitled to such services
  0.110789 pro immigration A4 many undocumented immigrants cannot afford legal assistance and without it do not fare well in immigration court and their liberty is at risk
  0.105728 con immigration A4 funds are drawing tax dollars away from american citizens and legal resident aliens in need tax money should be to provide for citizens and legal resident aliens and not to prolong the stay of undocumented immigrants
  0.046073 pro immigration A4 without legal assistance many immigrants are often unaware of how their rights can be defended
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):1
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Devery Hamilton:I would say that this is a lot more people who are here illegally would be more likely to engage with a nonprofit organization to see count as opposed to government weather be local state or federal because they don't fully know all their rights. So they may feel as though the government will take advantage of the situation where they don't know what rights they have and what they don't have
  0.510911 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.510911 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.386736 con immigration A4 immigration is federal law and should not be up to the states to fund attorneys for undocumented immigrants
  0.243615 con immigration A4 immigration proceedings might be civil matters and no americans who are defending themselves in civil proceedings are entitled to taxpayer funded representation therefore undocumented immigrants should not be entitled to such services
  0.205068 pro immigration A4 without legal assistance many immigrants are often unaware of how their rights can be defended
  0.166345 pro immigration A4 many undocumented immigrants cannot afford legal assistance and without it do not fare well in immigration court and their liberty is at risk
  0.152310 pro immigration A4 not being able to afford legal services in immigration proceedings could result in unnecessary deportation this could split families apart and could place undue burdens on families and even the tax payers should children have to end up as wards of the state
  0.133762 con immigration A4 funds are drawing tax dollars away from american citizens and legal resident aliens in need tax money should be to provide for citizens and legal resident aliens and not to prolong the stay of undocumented immigrants
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):1
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Dante Laird:I don't know if I have a really different opinion as compared to the last issue. I think they probably need as much support and help if I can get in our current situation and climate. So yeah.
  0.616003 pro campaignFinanceReform A2 the status quo discourages grassroots and or third party candidates
  0.443284 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.270397 pro immigration A4 not being able to afford legal services in immigration proceedings could result in unnecessary deportation this could split families apart and could place undue burdens on families and even the tax payers should children have to end up as wards of the state
  0.262180 con immigration A4 immigration proceedings might be civil matters and no americans who are defending themselves in civil proceedings are entitled to taxpayer funded representation therefore undocumented immigrants should not be entitled to such services
  0.193665 con immigration A4 funds are drawing tax dollars away from american citizens and legal resident aliens in need tax money should be to provide for citizens and legal resident aliens and not to prolong the stay of undocumented immigrants
  0.072735 con immigration A4 immigration is federal law and should not be up to the states to fund attorneys for undocumented immigrants
  0.018497 pro immigration A4 many undocumented immigrants cannot afford legal assistance and without it do not fare well in immigration court and their liberty is at risk
  -0.021136 pro immigration A4 without legal assistance many immigrants are often unaware of how their rights can be defended
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):1
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):2
Cade Cannedy:Yeah, I would be like kind of initially concerned about like involving additional actors or it might not be necessary. But I think that I think this week or two speakers ago brought up a great point about how is my day more likely to reach out to a non-governmental organizations and they are with the government self. And I think that's it.
  0.681444 pro campaignFinanceReform A2 the status quo discourages grassroots and or third party candidates
  0.398017 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.155256 con immigration A4 immigration is federal law and should not be up to the states to fund attorneys for undocumented immigrants
  0.150844 con immigration A4 immigration proceedings might be civil matters and no americans who are defending themselves in civil proceedings are entitled to taxpayer funded representation therefore undocumented immigrants should not be entitled to such services
  0.038049 pro immigration A4 not being able to afford legal services in immigration proceedings could result in unnecessary deportation this could split families apart and could place undue burdens on families and even the tax payers should children have to end up as wards of the state
  -0.029368 pro immigration A4 many undocumented immigrants cannot afford legal assistance and without it do not fare well in immigration court and their liberty is at risk
  -0.057259 con immigration A4 funds are drawing tax dollars away from american citizens and legal resident aliens in need tax money should be to provide for citizens and legal resident aliens and not to prolong the stay of undocumented immigrants
  -0.065446 pro immigration A4 without legal assistance many immigrants are often unaware of how their rights can be defended
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):1
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
---------
New section
---------
Devery Hamilton:I definitely think that people have been in this country for a long time and predominantly El Nino. This country and you would have committed any serious crime should definitely be given a path to Legal immigration. Can I send something like that? The one thing that I that I do? Where are your wonder about that is how people can verify that they've been in the country for 10 years if they you know came here illegally and they don't have paperwork and things like that, but I don't think I should be a limiting factor in them getting their path to citizenship.
  0.708581 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  0.708581 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  0.551571 pro immigration A5 creating legal options for those who have been in the country over long period of time without committing other crimes will put them on path through to citizenship without the fear of being deported
  0.408344 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
  0.394014 con immigration A5 providing pathways to citizenship and legalization rewards illegal immigrants and disrespects those who have come to the country legally
  0.115270 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
  0.025776 pro immigration A5 it is in the national interest as testified by members of the national security community to determine who is residing in the be it lawfully or unlawfully in order to create database for law enforcement purposes
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):1
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):1
Cade Cannedy:Yeah, I think whether or not there should be a pathway to citizenship is on a more or less a closed question. I think it should be it is a question of like how brought it needs to be because obviously we're going to want to incorporate individuals who have been in a picture of the existence of this country formerly and not just continue to like relegate them as second-class Citizens.
  0.650894 pro campaignFinanceReform A2 the status quo discourages grassroots and or third party candidates
  0.537625 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  0.351238 pro immigration A5 creating legal options for those who have been in the country over long period of time without committing other crimes will put them on path through to citizenship without the fear of being deported
  0.264967 con immigration A5 providing pathways to citizenship and legalization rewards illegal immigrants and disrespects those who have come to the country legally
  0.126958 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
  0.065958 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
  -0.062413 pro immigration A5 it is in the national interest as testified by members of the national security community to determine who is residing in the be it lawfully or unlawfully in order to create database for law enforcement purposes
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):1
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Toni Adeyemi:Sorry about that. I don't know what happened. You guys have a question like now that Matt is just
  0.795702 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.795702 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.104306 con immigration A5 providing pathways to citizenship and legalization rewards illegal immigrants and disrespects those who have come to the country legally
  0.062919 pro immigration A5 creating legal options for those who have been in the country over long period of time without committing other crimes will put them on path through to citizenship without the fear of being deported
  0.016029 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
  -0.065399 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
  -0.069566 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  -0.078654 pro immigration A5 it is in the national interest as testified by members of the national security community to determine who is residing in the be it lawfully or unlawfully in order to create database for law enforcement purposes
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
---------
New section
---------
Nya Hughes:I agree that we should allocate funds to those governments are because of that one point about
  0.674896 con alicesClass A3 this would encourage more coalition governments meaning instability and excessive influence for those parties that hold the balance of power
  0.239673 con immigration A4 funds are drawing tax dollars away from american citizens and legal resident aliens in need tax money should be to provide for citizens and legal resident aliens and not to prolong the stay of undocumented immigrants
  0.061341 pro immigration A4 not being able to afford legal services in immigration proceedings could result in unnecessary deportation this could split families apart and could place undue burdens on families and even the tax payers should children have to end up as wards of the state
  0.025204 con immigration A4 immigration is federal law and should not be up to the states to fund attorneys for undocumented immigrants
  0.004852 pro immigration A4 many undocumented immigrants cannot afford legal assistance and without it do not fare well in immigration court and their liberty is at risk
  -0.007539 pro immigration A4 without legal assistance many immigrants are often unaware of how their rights can be defended
  -0.066577 con immigration A4 immigration proceedings might be civil matters and no americans who are defending themselves in civil proceedings are entitled to taxpayer funded representation therefore undocumented immigrants should not be entitled to such services
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):1
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
---------
New section
---------
Toni Adeyemi:lack of knowledge about immigration law as far as like was the previous question thing where to buy legal counsel to anyone and just want people who are
  0.674343 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.674343 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.561338 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
  0.304339 pro immigration A5 creating legal options for those who have been in the country over long period of time without committing other crimes will put them on path through to citizenship without the fear of being deported
  0.256502 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
  0.216436 pro immigration A5 it is in the national interest as testified by members of the national security community to determine who is residing in the be it lawfully or unlawfully in order to create database for law enforcement purposes
  0.198340 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  -0.030814 con immigration A5 providing pathways to citizenship and legalization rewards illegal immigrants and disrespects those who have come to the country legally
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Cade Cannedy:Yeah, I interpreted. This one is being a question of whether or not they should be like other legal options available besides the one that we just debated discuss.
  0.661146 pro microworkers A3 this system would reduce the danger of polarizing outcomes in party primaries by generating one blanket primary in which all candidates contest
  0.497968 pro immigration A5 creating legal options for those who have been in the country over long period of time without committing other crimes will put them on path through to citizenship without the fear of being deported
  0.483995 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
  0.267022 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
  0.228174 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  0.129032 con immigration A5 providing pathways to citizenship and legalization rewards illegal immigrants and disrespects those who have come to the country legally
  -0.038408 pro immigration A5 it is in the national interest as testified by members of the national security community to determine who is residing in the be it lawfully or unlawfully in order to create database for law enforcement purposes
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Cade Cannedy:Quickly, does anyone giving away to the argument that providing a pathway to citizenship supper ehlinger Ward's illegal immigrants are coming here illegally doesn't even get that out.
  0.889227 con immigration A5 providing pathways to citizenship and legalization rewards illegal immigrants and disrespects those who have come to the country legally
  0.889227 con immigration A5 providing pathways to citizenship and legalization rewards illegal immigrants and disrespects those who have come to the country legally
  0.674905 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  0.536572 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
  0.329044 pro immigration A5 creating legal options for those who have been in the country over long period of time without committing other crimes will put them on path through to citizenship without the fear of being deported
  0.034752 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
  -0.004151 pro immigration A5 it is in the national interest as testified by members of the national security community to determine who is residing in the be it lawfully or unlawfully in order to create database for law enforcement purposes
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
---------
New section
---------
Sophie Keller:Okay. I'm just to get things going. I personally think that it's more important for crimes to be reported then for police officers to know the immigration status of the people that they're talking to. So my initial stance is that I don't think police officers officers should be allowed to inquire about immigration status for the sake of promoting open and honest reporting of crimes when they happen
  0.682219 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.682219 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.627268 con immigration A1 victims of crimes who are undocumented or have family who are undocumented are often afraid of coming forward because the police could ask about their immigration status or that of their family this creates population of silent victims and may discourage the reporting of crimes
  0.549011 con immigration A1 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
  0.521247 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.501832 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.412309 pro immigration A1 if police officer cannot identify the perpetrator of crime domestic violence where victim fights back in self defense and has probable cause that either party is in the country illegally the officer should be allowed to inquire about the immigration status of all parties
  0.330827 con immigration A1 if victims are afraid to come forward to report the crime it could make it easier for crime to happen in those areas
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):0
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):2
Alex Trivella:How to give a selfie I think that the police officers being able to ask immigration status of crimes are going to the police.
  0.771170 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.771170 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.645714 con immigration A1 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
  0.620971 con immigration A1 victims of crimes who are undocumented or have family who are undocumented are often afraid of coming forward because the police could ask about their immigration status or that of their family this creates population of silent victims and may discourage the reporting of crimes
  0.484660 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.470330 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.377499 con immigration A1 if victims are afraid to come forward to report the crime it could make it easier for crime to happen in those areas
  0.340881 pro immigration A1 if police officer cannot identify the perpetrator of crime domestic violence where victim fights back in self defense and has probable cause that either party is in the country illegally the officer should be allowed to inquire about the immigration status of all parties
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Akim Richards:I'm your vehicle that argument would also suggest that the standard of reasonable suspicion cuz sometimes be subjective and arbitrary and apply to People based on.
  0.588762 pro campaignFinanceReform A1 the congress and the states should set reasonable campaign finance regulations
  0.574870 pro immigration A2 if police officer has reasonable suspicion to believe witness might be undocumented the officer should not be prohibited from checking that she or he is legal in this country offering reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause
  0.352367 pro immigration A1 if police officer cannot identify the perpetrator of crime domestic violence where victim fights back in self defense and has probable cause that either party is in the country illegally the officer should be allowed to inquire about the immigration status of all parties
  0.136905 con immigration A1 victims of crimes who are undocumented or have family who are undocumented are often afraid of coming forward because the police could ask about their immigration status or that of their family this creates population of silent victims and may discourage the reporting of crimes
  0.086667 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.013443 con immigration A1 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
  -0.012976 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  -0.201285 con immigration A1 if victims are afraid to come forward to report the crime it could make it easier for crime to happen in those areas
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):0
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Nolan Matcovich:I think one other important thing that popped up like pop up for me while I'm reading. The briefing was that I felt that the I felt bad asking about the immigration status of a victim of a crime was really irrelevant will not start of matter. But that also the third they really seem to be any specific specific rules on how I'm about to go to work. And so it seemed as if in some in some regions are some jurisdictions that if I'm police officer a federal agent is asking about the month of migration status about my pack on whether or not they get the standard of Cordell Impossible on other jurisdictions.
  0.654701 pro immigration A1 if police officer cannot identify the perpetrator of crime domestic violence where victim fights back in self defense and has probable cause that either party is in the country illegally the officer should be allowed to inquire about the immigration status of all parties
  0.654701 pro immigration A1 if police officer cannot identify the perpetrator of crime domestic violence where victim fights back in self defense and has probable cause that either party is in the country illegally the officer should be allowed to inquire about the immigration status of all parties
  0.592441 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.445002 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.437584 con immigration A1 victims of crimes who are undocumented or have family who are undocumented are often afraid of coming forward because the police could ask about their immigration status or that of their family this creates population of silent victims and may discourage the reporting of crimes
  0.358214 con immigration A1 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
  0.277109 con immigration A1 if victims are afraid to come forward to report the crime it could make it easier for crime to happen in those areas
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):0
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Isabel Maddick:Condom on. Sandler know I was kind of worried about like what would be the order of like a currents are happening? So it's like let's say if this is allowed in the police officer ask immigration status and they were undocumented like wood them as a victim of the crime then have like no more saying what happened you're having a stocking fry.
  0.750633 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.750633 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.605187 pro immigration A1 if police officer cannot identify the perpetrator of crime domestic violence where victim fights back in self defense and has probable cause that either party is in the country illegally the officer should be allowed to inquire about the immigration status of all parties
  0.461542 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.410283 con immigration A1 victims of crimes who are undocumented or have family who are undocumented are often afraid of coming forward because the police could ask about their immigration status or that of their family this creates population of silent victims and may discourage the reporting of crimes
  0.260529 con immigration A1 if victims are afraid to come forward to report the crime it could make it easier for crime to happen in those areas
  0.214365 con immigration A1 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):0
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):1
Evan Enriques:Yeah, I second that. I I think the main thing is like this is such a policy is implemented. It doesn't it doesn't hurt a victim's credibility in terms of like I don't know what what their involvement is in certain issues.
  0.784030 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.784030 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.085565 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.067700 pro immigration A1 if police officer cannot identify the perpetrator of crime domestic violence where victim fights back in self defense and has probable cause that either party is in the country illegally the officer should be allowed to inquire about the immigration status of all parties
  0.044756 con immigration A1 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
  0.008667 con immigration A1 victims of crimes who are undocumented or have family who are undocumented are often afraid of coming forward because the police could ask about their immigration status or that of their family this creates population of silent victims and may discourage the reporting of crimes
  -0.063518 con immigration A1 if victims are afraid to come forward to report the crime it could make it easier for crime to happen in those areas
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):0
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Alex Trivella:I can't hear you. I don't know if your microphone is working in the heat.
  0.911071 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
  0.911071 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
  0.233065 pro immigration A1 some victims are undocumented immigrants and police should not be prohibited from asking and enforcing immigration law
  0.117755 con immigration A1 victims of crimes who are undocumented or have family who are undocumented are often afraid of coming forward because the police could ask about their immigration status or that of their family this creates population of silent victims and may discourage the reporting of crimes
  -0.008017 con immigration A1 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
  -0.047277 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  -0.109909 con immigration A1 if victims are afraid to come forward to report the crime it could make it easier for crime to happen in those areas
  -0.193375 pro immigration A1 if police officer cannot identify the perpetrator of crime domestic violence where victim fights back in self defense and has probable cause that either party is in the country illegally the officer should be allowed to inquire about the immigration status of all parties
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
---------
New section
---------
Isabel Maddick:Surviving on this one was like even more that I guess in the last one if you're a witness to a crime, I think we really want to encourage those people to come forward just because I think it's more necessary and in like solving crimes in my kind of getting to the bottom of whether or not so just report. I kind of think that they should not be able to us.
  0.639178 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.639178 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.534977 con immigration A2 if witness is afraid to come forward to testify it could result in the perpetrator going free and would undermine the justice system
  0.532049 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
  0.345604 pro immigration A2 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.155493 con immigration A2 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
  0.029611 pro immigration A2 if police officer has reasonable suspicion to believe witness might be undocumented the officer should not be prohibited from checking that she or he is legal in this country offering reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):0
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):1
Nolan Matcovich:Words to this prompt and the previous agenda item. What are the things that stood out for me? And then just in time, I feel like masturbating General Boston to bring material is that they talked a lot about how about how weather like the person has committed a crime that in that case. There are there immigration status might be relevant to this case of the witness the witness. I got you. I found the both of us what kind of irrelevant since neither of them are committing a crime by coming for anything?
  0.683343 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
  0.683343 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
  0.602215 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.474048 pro immigration A2 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.432339 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
  0.339051 con immigration A2 if witness is afraid to come forward to testify it could result in the perpetrator going free and would undermine the justice system
  0.299098 pro immigration A2 if police officer has reasonable suspicion to believe witness might be undocumented the officer should not be prohibited from checking that she or he is legal in this country offering reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause
  0.252854 con immigration A2 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Evan Enriques:Yeah, I just think it's it's kind of seems very subjective and I think if there were specific guidelines set in place or I don't know like some basic just basic guidelines in terms of how a police officer can go about acquiring about immigration statuses are doing this. I think it'd be interesting to see how that would play out.
  0.577231 pro immigration A1 if police officer cannot identify the perpetrator of crime domestic violence where victim fights back in self defense and has probable cause that either party is in the country illegally the officer should be allowed to inquire about the immigration status of all parties
  0.577231 pro immigration A1 if police officer cannot identify the perpetrator of crime domestic violence where victim fights back in self defense and has probable cause that either party is in the country illegally the officer should be allowed to inquire about the immigration status of all parties
  0.575599 pro immigration A2 if police officer has reasonable suspicion to believe witness might be undocumented the officer should not be prohibited from checking that she or he is legal in this country offering reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause
  0.523259 pro immigration A2 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.362752 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.257468 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
  0.175434 con immigration A2 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
  -0.016154 con immigration A2 if witness is afraid to come forward to testify it could result in the perpetrator going free and would undermine the justice system
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Nolan Matcovich:I was wondering if any of you guys had an opinion on the last Pro point where it talks about it seems like he or she will be detained while Investments on while the investigation is ongoing. I'm in some cases if they're good witness. They can be potentially become a legal Citizen and parole while I was kind of a strange sort of tangent to how the how the briefing material talked about. I think one of the later discussion points on Uno remaining in the country for long process of legal citizenship.
  0.797377 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
  0.797377 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
  0.562594 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.258605 con immigration A2 if witness is afraid to come forward to testify it could result in the perpetrator going free and would undermine the justice system
  0.226148 pro immigration A2 if police officer has reasonable suspicion to believe witness might be undocumented the officer should not be prohibited from checking that she or he is legal in this country offering reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause
  0.166449 pro immigration A2 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.003059 con immigration A2 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):1
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):3
Alex Trivella:Yes, or yes or no Bass Pro point of a cop-out answer or argument is no guarantee for the detained person about what's going to happen is going to happen.
  0.713100 pro campaignFinanceReform A2 the status quo discourages grassroots and or third party candidates
  0.519176 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.481274 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
  0.454523 con immigration A2 if witness is afraid to come forward to testify it could result in the perpetrator going free and would undermine the justice system
  0.010578 pro immigration A2 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  -0.018336 con immigration A2 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
  -0.058577 pro immigration A2 if police officer has reasonable suspicion to believe witness might be undocumented the officer should not be prohibited from checking that she or he is legal in this country offering reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Eleanor Frost:I would agree with that. I don't think it's really reassuring to be told that you're not necessarily going to be the portal and I don't see witnesses to a crime picking up that is it insensitive to
  0.751605 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.751605 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.655287 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
  0.615027 con immigration A2 if witness is afraid to come forward to testify it could result in the perpetrator going free and would undermine the justice system
  0.044719 con immigration A2 few local law enforcement officers are able to do the work of federal officials or to recognize the specialized documents that provide proof of immigration status
  0.024871 pro immigration A2 if police officer has reasonable suspicion to believe witness might be undocumented the officer should not be prohibited from checking that she or he is legal in this country offering reasonable suspicion rather than probable cause
  0.022976 pro immigration A2 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):0
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):3
---------
New section
---------
Eleanor Frost:I would say that they should even though they're not citizens because they might not know the language or they might not be familiar with the laws of the United States and may not know that they could seek Asylum or Specialties of that's anything so being at a particular disadvantage. I think it could be useful for them.
  0.639978 pro campaignFinanceReform A2 the status quo discourages grassroots and or third party candidates
  0.567232 con immigration A4 immigration proceedings might be civil matters and no americans who are defending themselves in civil proceedings are entitled to taxpayer funded representation therefore undocumented immigrants should not be entitled to such services
  0.414836 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
  0.247887 con immigration A3 undocumented immigrants are here illegally and should not have the same rights as citizens or noncitizens here legally
  0.161083 con immigration A3 tax dollars should not be spent on court appointed attorneys and translators to defend undocumented immigrants here illegally
  0.097306 pro immigration A3 providing legal counsel could help those going through immigration proceedings be granted judicial relief keeping immigrant families together saves money for the statea taxpayers in increased tax revenues and less need for families left behind to draw on the social safety net
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):1
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):1
Isabel Maddick:I think if there would have to be some sort of like selection process there is not try to say it. But like some way to kind of filter through who truly needs to be like going through the court system in search of an asylum are special Lisa and who like maybe like is not and has gone through the process in a different way because that is using it is going to end up like costing money and taking time and I think that's something that needs to be like you said and done with caution more than just like everyone can get a court appointed the court-appointed.
  0.669029 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.669029 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.213977 pro immigration A3 providing legal counsel could help those going through immigration proceedings be granted judicial relief keeping immigrant families together saves money for the statea taxpayers in increased tax revenues and less need for families left behind to draw on the social safety net
  0.178496 con immigration A3 tax dollars should not be spent on court appointed attorneys and translators to defend undocumented immigrants here illegally
  -0.007989 con immigration A3 undocumented immigrants are here illegally and should not have the same rights as citizens or noncitizens here legally
  -0.034428 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Alex Trivella:Yeah, I agree. I think it's the flu a financial strain at the same time. I don't think that a lot of undocumented immigrants know the distinction between their migration statuses so I can not to mention sometimes the language barrier makes it difficult so I can go to to understand how to how to navigate the process.
  0.795515 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
  0.795515 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
  0.635748 con immigration A3 undocumented immigrants are here illegally and should not have the same rights as citizens or noncitizens here legally
  0.551640 con immigration A3 tax dollars should not be spent on court appointed attorneys and translators to defend undocumented immigrants here illegally
  0.015179 pro immigration A3 providing legal counsel could help those going through immigration proceedings be granted judicial relief keeping immigrant families together saves money for the statea taxpayers in increased tax revenues and less need for families left behind to draw on the social safety net
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):1
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):1
Nolan Matcovich:Yard, also really agree kind of jumping off of that but you're one of the arguments presented is about tax dollars and you know how you can spend money whether or not the government should be spending money on to our citizens are legal residents if if there were to be whether or not it's just a number the number of court-appointed counsel or if it's some other thing like Alex just adjusted. I'm some sort of in-between I think about is also possible way to navigate to struggle between president.
  0.565390 pro campaignFinanceReform A2 the status quo discourages grassroots and or third party candidates
  0.531860 con immigration A4 funds are drawing tax dollars away from american citizens and legal resident aliens in need tax money should be to provide for citizens and legal resident aliens and not to prolong the stay of undocumented immigrants
  0.404492 con immigration A3 tax dollars should not be spent on court appointed attorneys and translators to defend undocumented immigrants here illegally
  0.360616 pro immigration A3 providing legal counsel could help those going through immigration proceedings be granted judicial relief keeping immigrant families together saves money for the statea taxpayers in increased tax revenues and less need for families left behind to draw on the social safety net
  0.323151 con immigration A3 undocumented immigrants are here illegally and should not have the same rights as citizens or noncitizens here legally
  0.237576 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):2
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):2
---------
New section
---------
Sophie Keller:I think one thing that's interesting about this proposal is that the ideas that local governments should be responsible for allocating this funding which I think is a pretty serious weakness to the for the proposal just because it puts more strain on those counties localities where immigration is more present as opposed to Distributing resources from from the nation as a whole and because this is a national consideration, you know is part of our conversation at the federal level. I think that funding should come from
  0.690509 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.690509 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.483640 con immigration A4 immigration is federal law and should not be up to the states to fund attorneys for undocumented immigrants
  0.161680 con immigration A4 immigration proceedings might be civil matters and no americans who are defending themselves in civil proceedings are entitled to taxpayer funded representation therefore undocumented immigrants should not be entitled to such services
  0.158596 pro immigration A4 not being able to afford legal services in immigration proceedings could result in unnecessary deportation this could split families apart and could place undue burdens on families and even the tax payers should children have to end up as wards of the state
  0.099645 pro immigration A4 many undocumented immigrants cannot afford legal assistance and without it do not fare well in immigration court and their liberty is at risk
  0.054082 pro immigration A4 without legal assistance many immigrants are often unaware of how their rights can be defended
  0.015229 con immigration A4 funds are drawing tax dollars away from american citizens and legal resident aliens in need tax money should be to provide for citizens and legal resident aliens and not to prolong the stay of undocumented immigrants
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):2
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):1
Nolan Matcovich:I think with regard to the effect of a local nonprofit, I would definitely agree with Sophie that I think it should be handled on more no more no more federal or maybe even just like a Statewide basis stuff from the commercial larger-scale, but I think that one thing that the one thing to nonprofit aspect really brings to it is the idea that governments will a state or federal government while they have the funding for this that depending on who is in power in that government that there's less of a less of an ability to kind of to change the way in which immigrants are receiving funding for his legal services and that it's left up to someone else who may not have a political agenda.
  0.715109 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.715109 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.467019 con immigration A4 immigration is federal law and should not be up to the states to fund attorneys for undocumented immigrants
  0.348118 pro immigration A4 not being able to afford legal services in immigration proceedings could result in unnecessary deportation this could split families apart and could place undue burdens on families and even the tax payers should children have to end up as wards of the state
  0.224495 con immigration A4 immigration proceedings might be civil matters and no americans who are defending themselves in civil proceedings are entitled to taxpayer funded representation therefore undocumented immigrants should not be entitled to such services
  0.217216 pro immigration A4 many undocumented immigrants cannot afford legal assistance and without it do not fare well in immigration court and their liberty is at risk
  0.187447 con immigration A4 funds are drawing tax dollars away from american citizens and legal resident aliens in need tax money should be to provide for citizens and legal resident aliens and not to prolong the stay of undocumented immigrants
  0.139528 pro immigration A4 without legal assistance many immigrants are often unaware of how their rights can be defended
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):1
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Alex Trivella:The label of nonprofit fraud very difficult to know exactly what it could be a mechanism for.
  0.915311 con alicesClass A3 there would be more gridlock as with more parties it would be more difficult to reach agreements
  0.345055 pro immigration A3 deportation proceedings often involve complex legal questions that most of undocumented immigrants do not know how to navigate
  0.290764 con immigration A4 immigration proceedings might be civil matters and no americans who are defending themselves in civil proceedings are entitled to taxpayer funded representation therefore undocumented immigrants should not be entitled to such services
  0.136269 pro immigration A4 not being able to afford legal services in immigration proceedings could result in unnecessary deportation this could split families apart and could place undue burdens on families and even the tax payers should children have to end up as wards of the state
  0.089863 pro immigration A4 without legal assistance many immigrants are often unaware of how their rights can be defended
  0.085079 con immigration A4 immigration is federal law and should not be up to the states to fund attorneys for undocumented immigrants
  0.072254 pro immigration A4 many undocumented immigrants cannot afford legal assistance and without it do not fare well in immigration court and their liberty is at risk
  0.000465 con immigration A4 funds are drawing tax dollars away from american citizens and legal resident aliens in need tax money should be to provide for citizens and legal resident aliens and not to prolong the stay of undocumented immigrants
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Christian Badillo:Can anyone hear me? Okay. So what I kind of originally thought when I saw this was maybe it's a good thing for local governments to allocate funding if they can but we could also be a potential issue is that depending on the local government itself? That would be a very wide range of what they'd be willing to allocate Fleming wise and it would make certain localities more favorable less favorable towards immigration legal services, so
  0.752817 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.752817 con immigration A2 if local law enforcement officers ask witnesses of crimes about their immigration status it could lead to increased distrust in the legal system witnesses would have less incentive to come forward if they are in fear of being questioned detained and or deported
  0.365638 pro immigration A4 not being able to afford legal services in immigration proceedings could result in unnecessary deportation this could split families apart and could place undue burdens on families and even the tax payers should children have to end up as wards of the state
  0.316878 con immigration A4 immigration is federal law and should not be up to the states to fund attorneys for undocumented immigrants
  0.248662 pro immigration A4 many undocumented immigrants cannot afford legal assistance and without it do not fare well in immigration court and their liberty is at risk
  0.231997 con immigration A4 funds are drawing tax dollars away from american citizens and legal resident aliens in need tax money should be to provide for citizens and legal resident aliens and not to prolong the stay of undocumented immigrants
  0.212631 pro immigration A4 without legal assistance many immigrants are often unaware of how their rights can be defended
  0.088510 con immigration A4 immigration proceedings might be civil matters and no americans who are defending themselves in civil proceedings are entitled to taxpayer funded representation therefore undocumented immigrants should not be entitled to such services
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Evan Enriques:I think it'll be interesting to breakdown how funds should be allotted based on number of expected immigrants. Ikaria. I guess you can say and I think Christians you just made a good point like. Kind of forgot what he said, but I just remember it was a good point.
  0.648585 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
  0.648585 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
  0.337365 con immigration A4 funds are drawing tax dollars away from american citizens and legal resident aliens in need tax money should be to provide for citizens and legal resident aliens and not to prolong the stay of undocumented immigrants
  0.236863 pro immigration A4 not being able to afford legal services in immigration proceedings could result in unnecessary deportation this could split families apart and could place undue burdens on families and even the tax payers should children have to end up as wards of the state
  0.047742 con immigration A4 immigration proceedings might be civil matters and no americans who are defending themselves in civil proceedings are entitled to taxpayer funded representation therefore undocumented immigrants should not be entitled to such services
  -0.017380 con immigration A4 immigration is federal law and should not be up to the states to fund attorneys for undocumented immigrants
  -0.022297 pro immigration A4 without legal assistance many immigrants are often unaware of how their rights can be defended
  -0.026881 pro immigration A4 many undocumented immigrants cannot afford legal assistance and without it do not fare well in immigration court and their liberty is at risk
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):0

Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):---------
New section
---------
Christian Badillo:So I think this is probably a good thing. Although I'm not sure 10 years is kind of seems like a long time especially for younger children open near absolute lie. I think there should be legal options for undocumented immigrants could change but I think for sure there should be an option.
  0.631473 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
  0.631473 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
  0.575999 pro immigration A5 creating legal options for those who have been in the country over long period of time without committing other crimes will put them on path through to citizenship without the fear of being deported
  0.398939 con immigration A5 providing pathways to citizenship and legalization rewards illegal immigrants and disrespects those who have come to the country legally
  0.286478 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
  0.274613 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  0.036124 pro immigration A5 it is in the national interest as testified by members of the national security community to determine who is residing in the be it lawfully or unlawfully in order to create database for law enforcement purposes
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):1
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Nolan Matcovich:I definitely agree on that. I think there should be an option for staying know if you stay in the country long enough in your Society. Well enough that there should be a citizenship. I mean maybe there should be one or two maybe a few more kind of other necessary requirements on an addition to just having spent 10 years in the country because I I do I do think that that one of the consequences Raves about sort of legal immigration process and how many people would maybe just by going going insane cuz I think you could be a problem, but I think the idea itself is not about
  0.518657 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
  0.518657 pro immigration A2 even though witness to crime is detained it does not necessarily mean that she or he will be deported deportation proceedings commence only when an individual comes to the attention of immigration authorities and is deemed to be deportable she or he will be detained while the investigation is on going and in some cases where she or he becomes good witness she or he can potentially become legal citizen or paroled while the action is in process
  0.514458 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  0.414200 pro immigration A5 creating legal options for those who have been in the country over long period of time without committing other crimes will put them on path through to citizenship without the fear of being deported
  0.260824 con immigration A5 providing pathways to citizenship and legalization rewards illegal immigrants and disrespects those who have come to the country legally
  0.256015 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
  0.202169 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
  0.109592 pro immigration A5 it is in the national interest as testified by members of the national security community to determine who is residing in the be it lawfully or unlawfully in order to create database for law enforcement purposes
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):1
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):1
Evan Enriques:yeah, I just wanted to point out the second Khan and like it almost seems like a double-edged sword like the fact that you might create some or intensify someone to stay so long in the country is also like I don't know. It just seems like a double-edged sword because you're incentivizes someone to stay for a certain amount of time. But you're also encouraging them to kind of stay illegally. I think there needs to be some. Some breakdown in terms of how that would work.
  0.654396 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.654396 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.459958 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  0.246829 pro immigration A5 creating legal options for those who have been in the country over long period of time without committing other crimes will put them on path through to citizenship without the fear of being deported
  0.239498 con immigration A5 providing pathways to citizenship and legalization rewards illegal immigrants and disrespects those who have come to the country legally
  0.155359 pro immigration A5 it is in the national interest as testified by members of the national security community to determine who is residing in the be it lawfully or unlawfully in order to create database for law enforcement purposes
  0.093153 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
  0.063227 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):0
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):2
Eleanor Frost:I don't really see people who overstay their visas for a short. Of time are extending their stay for 10 years to get this benefit cuz that is such a long time. So I think it does kind of reward undocumented immigrants who commit serious crimes.
  0.649411 con immigration A3 undocumented immigrants are here illegally and should not have the same rights as citizens or noncitizens here legally
  0.649411 con immigration A3 undocumented immigrants are here illegally and should not have the same rights as citizens or noncitizens here legally
  0.576614 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  0.514063 con immigration A5 providing pathways to citizenship and legalization rewards illegal immigrants and disrespects those who have come to the country legally
  0.409095 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
  0.386541 pro immigration A5 creating legal options for those who have been in the country over long period of time without committing other crimes will put them on path through to citizenship without the fear of being deported
  0.347436 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
  0.134069 pro immigration A5 it is in the national interest as testified by members of the national security community to determine who is residing in the be it lawfully or unlawfully in order to create database for law enforcement purposes
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):0
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):2
Akim Richards:And I'm also don't get the idea that the legal age that would be provided to an immigrant overseas. If you guys like automatic citizenship, I think there are they legal options will become the table that are probably more appropriate for the situation of renewable some contingent Visa will also be appropriate or even leave work. And so I don't think it automatically mandates citizenship there other options.
  0.643909 pro immigration A5 creating legal options for those who have been in the country over long period of time without committing other crimes will put them on path through to citizenship without the fear of being deported
  0.643909 pro immigration A5 creating legal options for those who have been in the country over long period of time without committing other crimes will put them on path through to citizenship without the fear of being deported
  0.575110 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
  0.345520 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  0.274086 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
  0.257399 con immigration A5 providing pathways to citizenship and legalization rewards illegal immigrants and disrespects those who have come to the country legally
  0.014610 pro immigration A5 it is in the national interest as testified by members of the national security community to determine who is residing in the be it lawfully or unlawfully in order to create database for law enforcement purposes
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):0
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):1
Nolan Matcovich:I think one important thing to is the briefing the trailer from talk a little bit about this but the idea that it's really hard often times for you know, if you come to the United States or any Country Weekly that interview don't have a stamp in your passport. You don't have any sort of proof that you've been in the country for 10 years. And so you don't know one hand you need to find a way to have proof that you've actually been in the country for 10 years. But then on the other hand, there's you would also need to make sure that if someone were to stay in the country for 10 years. If they have proof that they've been there for that long. The unlikely immigration enforcement officers who try to come after them after 9 before they would then become a citizen.
  0.643179 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  0.643179 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  0.488728 con immigration A5 providing pathways to citizenship and legalization rewards illegal immigrants and disrespects those who have come to the country legally
  0.333272 pro immigration A5 creating legal options for those who have been in the country over long period of time without committing other crimes will put them on path through to citizenship without the fear of being deported
  0.298191 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
  0.129600 pro immigration A5 it is in the national interest as testified by members of the national security community to determine who is residing in the be it lawfully or unlawfully in order to create database for law enforcement purposes
  0.125046 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
Pros/cons label: -1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):0
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Isabel Maddick:Yeah, that's exactly what I was thinking about. Like what happened in the case if they take all this proves that they've been here for 10 years and then are like convicted for being here is an undocumented citizen. So I definitely think it would need to have a lot of it would need to be really well. Well respected just kind of among the population definitely like legal with this one. I think it's a good option. I think it makes a lot of sense if it's done correctly.
  0.509557 con immigration A4 funds are drawing tax dollars away from american citizens and legal resident aliens in need tax money should be to provide for citizens and legal resident aliens and not to prolong the stay of undocumented immigrants
  0.509557 con immigration A4 funds are drawing tax dollars away from american citizens and legal resident aliens in need tax money should be to provide for citizens and legal resident aliens and not to prolong the stay of undocumented immigrants
  0.411105 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
  0.386584 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
  0.354582 pro immigration A5 creating legal options for those who have been in the country over long period of time without committing other crimes will put them on path through to citizenship without the fear of being deported
  0.156965 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  0.023922 con immigration A5 providing pathways to citizenship and legalization rewards illegal immigrants and disrespects those who have come to the country legally
  -0.031502 pro immigration A5 it is in the national interest as testified by members of the national security community to determine who is residing in the be it lawfully or unlawfully in order to create database for law enforcement purposes
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010):1
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):
Nolan Matcovich:Yeah, I would say one one thing. I believe it was asking about this up. One thing that I thought was an interesting news about that sort of in-between of like maybe there's like a special Visa program. We're in some other new like in between where it doesn't necessarily be to you becoming a citizen to go after someone to the equipment because maybe I don't know how I feel like many of many things in this our seem to have high stakes are to have like a lot of potential in becoming a citizen example and I think the escalating some of that I love him.
  0.721130 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.721130 pro immigration A1 federal immigration officers are federal authorities and should have cooperation with local police just like any other federal agents
  0.162225 pro immigration A5 creating legal options for those who have been in the country over long period of time without committing other crimes will put them on path through to citizenship without the fear of being deported
  0.070103 con immigration A5 although they have not committed any serious crime they already violated the immigration law and can be seen as criminals it does not make sense to grant them legal status just because they do not commit other crimes
  0.067576 pro immigration A5 it is in the national interest as testified by members of the national security community to determine who is residing in the be it lawfully or unlawfully in order to create database for law enforcement purposes
  0.046009 pro immigration A5 providing legal options can help lower poverty among undocumented immigrants legal options would allow them to attain jobs legally pay into the tax system and would allow them to apply for jobs with higher pay
  -0.018071 con immigration A5 this would incentivize those who come to the country illegally or overstay their visas to stay here as long as possible in order to be eligible to convert their illegal status to legal status
  -0.060988 con immigration A5 providing pathways to citizenship and legalization rewards illegal immigrants and disrespects those who have come to the country legally
Pros/cons label: 1
Please enter 1 pro/con scores: 1 for pro, 0 for con, space for neutral (e.g.1 010): 
Please enter the actual pro/con point being discussed (format: "pro 2" or "2"):


Process finished with exit code 0