Formatting of functions using `=>` instead of return #359

nordlow · 2024-01-23T05:21:05Z

Can we have sdfmt format

struct S {
	int ________________________________________________________(int x) => x + 1;
}

as

struct S {
	int ________________________________________________________(int x)
	    => x + 1;
}

instead of current

struct S {
	int ________________________________________________________(int x) =>
	x + 1;
}

.

This goes some way to Fix snazzy-d#359, but the result could probably be improved somewhat with a clever span somewhere. This feature is presumably only used for things with fairly short names so one imagines the line wrapping behaviour won't be noticed much anyway...

maxhaton linked a pull request Sep 1, 2024 that will close this issue

sdfmt: Explicitly parse shortened function syntax #380

Open

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Formatting of functions using `=>` instead of return #359

Formatting of functions using `=>` instead of return #359

nordlow commented Jan 23, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Formatting of functions using => instead of return #359

Formatting of functions using => instead of return #359

Comments

nordlow commented Jan 23, 2024 • edited Loading

Formatting of functions using `=>` instead of return #359

Formatting of functions using `=>` instead of return #359

nordlow commented Jan 23, 2024 •

edited

Loading