-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 320
fix: LEAP-33: Fixes for labels by Taxonomy #1555
Conversation
- `findLabel()` for starters to use in Label context - fix `selectedLabels` back to act the same for Labels and Taxonomy - fix styling detection
It should work, but it doesn't
temporary fix, should find a proper fix and source of problem later
Last label couldn't be deleted now, the same as for Labels
Works only on regions, taxonomy item has no color yet
/git merge master
|
/git merge master
|
@mihow Hey! Sorry, that's actually a pretty different thing, allowing to label regions directly with taxonomy the same way we do with labels. But I like your approach there, we really missed Taxonomy in region's info panel! Will review it soon, thanks! |
/merge master |
/git merge master
|
That also should improve performance for huge Taxonomies
Final decision about using stored values everywhere wil s=come soon. For now stable bahaviour is always active with FF off. FF on has regress for now.
/git merge master
|
/git merge master
|
color
param inChoice
s inside TaxonomyPR fulfills these requirements
[fix|feat|ci|chore|doc]: TICKET-ID: Short description of change made
ex.fix: DEV-XXXX: Removed inconsistent code usage causing intermittent errors
Change has impacts in these area(s)
Describe the reason for change
Taxonomy as labeling tool had major issues
What libraries were added/updated?
none
Does this change affect performance?
nope
Does this change affect security?
nope
What feature flags were used to cover this change?
fflag_feat_front_lsdv_5452_taxonomy_labeling_110823_short
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
What level of testing was included in the change?
Which logical domain(s) does this change affect?
Taxonomy, Labels