Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[IGNORE] : just for DP #38549

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: release
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[IGNORE] : just for DP #38549

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ApekshaBhosale
Copy link
Contributor

@ApekshaBhosale ApekshaBhosale commented Jan 9, 2025

Description

Tip

Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team).

Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion, Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR.

Fixes #Issue Number
or
Fixes Issue URL

Warning

If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid.

Automation

/ok-to-test tags=""

🔍 Cypress test results

Caution

If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt the CI result for your PR.

Communication

Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?

  • Yes
  • No

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated CODEOWNERS file to add a new "UI Builders Pod" section
    • Assigned ownership of multiple UI-related files and directories to the @appsmithorg/anvil-team
    • Expanded code ownership structure to include additional UI development resources

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the CODEOWNERS file by introducing a new "UI Builders Pod" section, assigning ownership of numerous UI-related files and directories to the @appsmithorg/anvil-team. The changes comprehensively cover paths related to UI components, actions, reducers, sagas, selectors, and utility hooks within the app/client directory. The modification expands the ownership structure without altering any existing ownership assignments.

Changes

File/Directory Change Summary
app/client/generators/* Added to Anvil team ownership
app/client/src/actions/* Multiple action files assigned to Anvil team
app/client/src/components/propertyControls/* Assigned to Anvil team
app/client/src/layoutSystems/anvil/* Added to Anvil team ownership
app/client/src/pages/Editor/* Multiple Editor-related paths assigned to Anvil team
app/client/src/reducers/entityReducers/* Reducers related to canvas and auto-height assigned
app/client/src/reflow/* Assigned to Anvil team
app/client/src/sagas/* Comprehensive saga files related to widgets and canvas assigned
app/client/src/selectors/* Canvas and widget selectors assigned
app/client/src/utils/hooks/* Various utility hooks assigned
app/client/src/widgets/* Multiple widget-related files and directories assigned

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

skip-changelog

Poem

🏗️ Code ownership, a new frontier unfurls
Where Anvil team's expertise twirls
Lines of code, neatly assigned
A blueprint of teamwork, carefully designed
CODEOWNERS speaks, with clarity bright! 🚀

Finishing Touches

  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@ApekshaBhosale
Copy link
Contributor Author

/build-deploy-preview skip-tests=true

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Deploying Your Preview: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12684318856.
Workflow: On demand build Docker image and deploy preview.
skip-tests: true.
env: ``.
PR: 38549.
recreate: .

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
CODEOWNERS (2)

Line range hint 58-93: Resolve ownership conflicts with the App viewers pod.

There are overlapping ownership assignments that need to be resolved:

  1. app/client/src/components/propertyControls/* is assigned to both @appsmithorg/widgets-blocks and @appsmithorg/anvil-team
  2. app/client/src/widgets/* is assigned to @appsmithorg/widgets-blocks but specific widget files are assigned to @appsmithorg/anvil-team

This could lead to confusion about who has the final review authority.

Consider either:

  1. Removing duplicate assignments, or
  2. Making the ownership more specific by using more precise path patterns

Resolve ownership conflicts in CODEOWNERS patterns

The globstar patterns are valid and match existing files, but there are ownership conflicts:

  • app/client/src/components/propertyControls/* is assigned to both @appsmithorg/widgets-blocks and @appsmithorg/anvil-team
  • app/client/src/widgets/* (@appsmithorg/widgets-blocks) conflicts with specific widget files owned by @appsmithorg/anvil-team
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 58-93: Verify the globstar patterns.

The path patterns follow the correct syntax. However, let's verify that they match the intended files:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the new path patterns match existing files
# and don't conflict with other teams' ownership.

echo "Checking if paths exist and showing potential conflicts..."

# Check if the paths exist
for pattern in \
    "app/client/generators/" \
    "app/client/src/actions/canvasSelectionActions.ts" \
    "app/client/src/actions/reflowActions.ts" \
    "app/client/src/actions/widgetSelectionActions.ts" \
    "app/client/src/components/propertyControls/" \
    "app/client/src/layoutSystems/anvil/" \
    "app/client/src/pages/Editor/Canvas.tsx" \
    "app/client/src/pages/Editor/CanvasLayoutConversion/" \
    "app/client/src/pages/Editor/PropertyPane/" \
    "app/client/src/pages/Editor/WidgetsEditor/" \
    "app/client/src/widgets/BaseWidget.tsx" \
    "app/client/src/widgets/CanvasWidget.tsx"; do
    echo "Checking: $pattern"
    fd "$pattern"
done

# Show potential conflicts by checking if files match multiple patterns
echo -e "\nChecking for ownership conflicts..."
for file in $(fd -t f 'app/client/src/(components/propertyControls|widgets)/'); do
    echo "Checking ownership for: $file"
    rg -l "^$file\s+@" CODEOWNERS || true
done

Length of output: 11377


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify paths with correct fd syntax and check conflicts

echo "Checking directories..."
for dir in \
    "app/client/src/components/propertyControls" \
    "app/client/src/layoutSystems/anvil" \
    "app/client/src/pages/Editor/CanvasLayoutConversion" \
    "app/client/src/pages/Editor/PropertyPane" \
    "app/client/src/pages/Editor/WidgetsEditor"; do
    echo "Directory: $dir"
    fd --full-path "$dir$" || echo "Not found: $dir"
done

echo -e "\nChecking specific files..."
for file in \
    "canvasSelectionActions.ts" \
    "reflowActions.ts" \
    "widgetSelectionActions.ts" \
    "Canvas.tsx" \
    "BaseWidget.tsx" \
    "CanvasWidget.tsx"; do
    echo "File: $file"
    fd "$file$"
done

echo -e "\nChecking for ownership conflicts in CODEOWNERS..."
rg "^app/client/src/(components/propertyControls|widgets).*\s+@" CODEOWNERS

Length of output: 5419

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
CODEOWNERS (1)

55-55: Remove unnecessary empty line.

This empty line serves no purpose and should be removed for better readability.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4662317 and f741742.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • CODEOWNERS (1 hunks)

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Deploy-Preview-URL: https://ce-38549.dp.appsmith.com

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant