Allow additional args for colors in lasso

[maclandrol]

Changelogs

• Add support for some drawer options and fix edge cases where user-provided options are not properly handled. This concerns mostly the atom and bonds highlighting and color system

---

Checklist:

• Was this PR discussed in an issue? It is recommended to first discuss a new feature into a GitHub issue before opening a PR.
• Add tests to cover the fixed bug(s) or the new introduced feature(s) (if appropriate).
• Update the API documentation is a new function is added, or an existing one is deleted.
• Write concise and explanatory changelogs below.
• If possible, assign one of the following labels to the PR: feature, fix or test (or ask a maintainer to do it for you).

---

This PR allows us to now do something like this:

  smi = "CO[C@@H](O)C1=C(O[C@H](F)Cl)C(C#N)=C1ONNC[NH3+]"
  mol = dm.to_mol(smi)
  smarts_list = "CONN"
  highlight_atoms = [4, 5, 6]
  highlight_bonds = [1, 2, 3, 4]
  highlight_atom_colors = {4:(186,85,211), 5:(186,85,211), 6:(186,85,211)}
  highlight_bond_colors = {1:(186,85,211), 2:(186,85,211), 3:(186,85,211), 4:(186,85,211)}
  dm.lasso_highlight_image(mol, smarts_list, highlight_atoms=highlight_atoms, highlight_bonds=highlight_bonds, highlight_atom_colors=highlight_atom_colors, highlight_bond_colors=highlight_bond_colors, continuousHighlight=False, circleAtoms=False)

See the purple part of the molecule here.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (5d1cde1) 91.95% compared to head (e56d083) 91.99%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #223      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.95%   91.99%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          46       46              
  Lines        3843     3873      +30     
==========================================
+ Hits         3534     3563      +29     
- Misses        309      310       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	91.99% <100.00%> (+0.03%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[zhu0619]

Thanks Manu.
Overall, it looks good to me.
I just have one question below.