Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci(spanner): use enterprise edition in instance autoscaler sample #14949

Merged

Conversation

scotthart
Copy link
Member

@scotthart scotthart commented Jan 22, 2025

This change is Reviewable

@scotthart scotthart requested a review from a team as a code owner January 22, 2025 16:16
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added api: spanner Issues related to the Spanner API. samples Issues that are directly related to samples. labels Jan 22, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 22, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 92.91%. Comparing base (0f5e910) to head (f2194e8).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
google/cloud/spanner/samples/samples.cc 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #14949   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.91%   92.91%           
=======================================
  Files        2351     2351           
  Lines      210082   210083    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits       195195   195196    +1     
  Misses      14887    14887           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@scotthart scotthart merged commit 706353d into googleapis:main Jan 22, 2025
70 of 73 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: spanner Issues related to the Spanner API. samples Issues that are directly related to samples.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants