Update commander 10.0.1 → 12.1.0 (major) #2
Conversation
![depfu[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/715?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
WalkthroughThe primary change involves upgrading the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
Files selected for processing (1)
- package.json (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
package.json (1)
25-25: Ensure compatibility with Commander 12.1.0.The update to
commanderversion^12.1.0introduces breaking changes. Ensure that:
- The application is compatible with Node.js version 18 or higher.
- Import statements are updated to named imports due to the removal of the default export.
- There are no conflicting options or commands in your codebase.
Consider setting up a CI system to automate compatibility checks.
Here is everything you need to know about this upgrade. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.
What changed?
✳️ commander (10.0.1 → 12.1.0) · Repo · Changelog
Release Notes
12.1.0
12.0.0
11.1.0
11.0.0
Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.
Commits
See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by more commits than we can show here.
👉 No CI detected
You don't seem to have any Continuous Integration service set up!
Without a service that will test the Depfu branches and pull requests, we can't inform you if incoming updates actually work with your app. We think that this degrades the service we're trying to provide down to a point where it is more or less meaningless.
This is fine if you just want to give Depfu a quick try. If you want to really let Depfu help you keep your app up-to-date, we recommend setting up a CI system:
* [Circle CI](https://circleci.com), [Semaphore ](https://semaphoreci.com) and [Github Actions](https://docs.github.com/actions) are all excellent options. * If you use something like Jenkins, make sure that you're using the Github integration correctly so that it reports status data back to Github. * If you have already set up a CI for this repository, you might need to check your configuration. Make sure it will run on all new branches. If you don’t want it to run on every branch, you can whitelist branches starting with `depfu/`.Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with
@depfu rebase.All Depfu comment commands
Summary by CodeRabbit
commanderlibrary to version^12.1.0, which may include improved features and bug fixes. Users may notice enhanced command handling and execution in the application.