Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

simplify EnvironmentVariablesConfigurationProvider.Load #6095

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SimonCropp
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #
Design discussion issue #

Changes

Please provide a brief description of the changes here.

Merge requirement checklist

  • CONTRIBUTING guidelines followed (license requirements, nullable enabled, static analysis, etc.)
  • Unit tests added/updated
  • Appropriate CHANGELOG.md files updated for non-trivial changes
  • Changes in public API reviewed (if applicable)

@SimonCropp SimonCropp requested a review from a team as a code owner January 23, 2025 10:52
Copy link
Contributor

@Kielek Kielek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From the header of the file:

// <auto-generated /> (Turns off StyleCop analysis in this file.)
// Licensed to the .NET Foundation under one or more agreements.
// The .NET Foundation licenses this file to you under the MIT license.

I suppose that the current construction is for the reason.
Maybe benchmarking? Did you have chance to verify it/and or double check the source of the file?

@SimonCropp
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Kielek what generates this file?

@Kielek
Copy link
Contributor

Kielek commented Jan 23, 2025

Please check #4092. It is marked as generated to avoid stylecop check

@SimonCropp
Copy link
Contributor Author

so if u manually duplicate a file, without also duplicating the tooling that generates it, then it is no longer a generated file

@Kielek
Copy link
Contributor

Kielek commented Jan 23, 2025

Yes, it is copied, and adjusted, but all parts are still valid:

  1. Are there any changes in the source of the file?
  2. I suppose that the current construction is for the reason. Maybe benchmarking? Did you have chance to verify it/and or double check the source of the file?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants