-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update to the v3.0 weather API #205
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request include an increment of the version number in the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Guppi.Core/Services/WeatherService.cs (1)
39-39
: Implement rate limiting for API calls
The One Call API v3.0 has a limit of 1000 free calls per day. Consider implementing rate limiting to:
- Track API usage
- Prevent exceeding the free tier limit
- Handle rate limit exceeded responses
Consider implementing:
- A caching layer to reduce API calls
- Rate tracking using a persistent store
- Circuit breaker pattern for rate limit handling
Would you like me to provide a detailed implementation proposal?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- Guppi.Console/Guppi.Console.csproj (1 hunks)
- Guppi.Console/Properties/launchSettings.json (1 hunks)
- Guppi.Core/Services/WeatherService.cs (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- Guppi.Console/Guppi.Console.csproj
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Guppi.Console/Properties/launchSettings.json (1)
5-5
: LGTM! Command line argument updated to align with weather API migration.
The change from "todo sync" to "weather daily" aligns well with the PR's objective of migrating to the weather API v3.0.
Guppi.Core/Services/WeatherService.cs (1)
39-39
: Verify API response compatibility with v3.0
The One Call API v3.0 might have a different response structure compared to v2.5. Ensure that the WeatherResponse
class can properly deserialize the new response format.
Let's verify the response model compatibility:
✅ Verification successful
Response model is compatible with OpenWeather API v3.0
After examining the WeatherResponse
class and its related models, I can confirm that the response structure is compatible with OpenWeather API v3.0. The model includes all essential fields from the One Call API response:
- Base fields: lat, lon, timezone
- Weather sections: current, hourly, daily
- Detailed weather data: temperature, feels like, pressure, humidity, wind, etc.
- Proper mapping of Unix timestamps and temperature units (Kelvin to Celsius)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for WeatherResponse class definition and usage
ast-grep --pattern 'class WeatherResponse {
$$$
}'
# Search for any response parsing or mapping code
rg -l "WeatherResponse" --type cs
Length of output: 173
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the WeatherResponse class implementation
cat Guppi.Core/Services/Weather/WeatherResponse.cs
# Also check for any weather-related test files that might show expected response structure
fd -e cs -e json test.*weather -i
Length of output: 6659
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify if the response structure matches OpenWeather API v3.0 by checking their documentation URL in the codebase
rg -i "openweather.*api|weather.*api" --type md
# Also check for any configuration or constants related to the API
rg -i "openweather" --type cs -g "!*test*" -g "!WeatherService.cs" -g "!WeatherResponse.cs"
Length of output: 323
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ | |||
"profiles": { | |||
"Guppi.Console": { | |||
"commandName": "Project", | |||
"commandLineArgs": "todo sync" | |||
"commandLineArgs": "weather daily" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
The "weather daily" command is properly implemented but needs documentation updates
The command is properly implemented in WeatherSkill.cs
with a dedicated handler:
daily
command is registered with description "Views the daily weather"- It has a proper handler method
Daily(location)
However, the documentation needs to be updated to include this command option. The current documentation only mentions basic weather functionality without detailing the available subcommands (view/now, hourly, daily).
Action items:
- Add documentation for the "daily" subcommand in the weather section of the documentation
- Include examples of usage with the
--location
parameter
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the new command and consider updating documentation.
Please ensure that:
- The "weather daily" command is properly implemented and tested with the new v3.0 API
- The change in default debug configuration is communicated to the development team
Let's verify if this command is properly documented:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the command is documented in README or help files
rg -i "weather daily" --type md
Length of output: 33
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for weather command implementations and documentation more broadly
# First, look for weather-related command handlers or implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
$$$
Weather$_($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Also search for any weather-related command registrations
rg -i "command.*weather" -A 3
# Check for any documentation files that might contain weather command info
fd -e md -e txt -x cat {} \; | rg -i "weather"
Length of output: 2588
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ public async Task<WeatherForecast> GetWeather(string latitude, string longitude) | |||
throw new UnconfiguredException("Please configure the weather provider"); | |||
} | |||
|
|||
var weather = await _restService.GetData<WeatherResponse>($"https://api.openweathermap.org/data/2.5/onecall?lat={latitude}&lon={longitude}&appid={_configuration.ApiKey}"); | |||
var weather = await _restService.GetData<WeatherResponse>($"https://api.openweathermap.org/data/3.0/onecall?lat={latitude}&lon={longitude}&appid={_configuration.ApiKey}"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider utilizing new API features
The v3.0 API offers additional features not currently used:
- Hyperlocal minute forecasts
- Extended daily forecasts
- Government weather alerts
- Historical weather data
Consider extending the WeatherResponse
model and API to support these features. Example parameters:
-$"https://api.openweathermap.org/data/3.0/onecall?lat={latitude}&lon={longitude}&appid={_configuration.ApiKey}"
+$"https://api.openweathermap.org/data/3.0/onecall?lat={latitude}&lon={longitude}&appid={_configuration.ApiKey}&minutely=1&alerts=1"
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add API version to configuration
Consider making the API version configurable to facilitate future migrations and testing.
Extract the API version to configuration:
+private const string DEFAULT_API_VERSION = "3.0";
+
var weather = await _restService.GetData<WeatherResponse>(
- $"https://api.openweathermap.org/data/3.0/onecall?lat={latitude}&lon={longitude}&appid={_configuration.ApiKey}"
+ $"https://api.openweathermap.org/data/{_configuration.ApiVersion ?? DEFAULT_API_VERSION}/onecall?lat={latitude}&lon={longitude}&appid={_configuration.ApiKey}"
);
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Enhance error handling for v3.0 specific scenarios
The current error handling only checks for configuration. Consider adding handling for:
- Rate limit exceeded responses
- New error response formats in v3.0
- API subscription status
Add specific exception handling:
var weather = await _restService.GetData<WeatherResponse>($"https://api.openweathermap.org/data/3.0/onecall?lat={latitude}&lon={longitude}&appid={_configuration.ApiKey}");
+if (weather == null)
+{
+ throw new WeatherApiException("Failed to retrieve weather data");
+}
+if (weather.IsRateLimitExceeded)
+{
+ throw new RateLimitExceededException("Daily API call limit exceeded");
+}
return weather.GetWeather();
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Fixes #204
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Version Update