Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Fix error of overwriting window.ReactOnRails #1684

Conversation

AbanoubGhadban
Copy link
Collaborator

@AbanoubGhadban AbanoubGhadban commented Jan 17, 2025

Summary

Remove this paragraph and provide a general description of the code changes in your pull
request... were there any bugs you had fixed? If so, mention them. If
these bugs have open GitHub issues, be sure to tag them here as well,
to keep the conversation linked together.

Pull Request checklist

Remove this line after checking all the items here. If the item is not applicable to the PR, both check it out and wrap it by ~.

  • Add/update test to cover these changes
  • Update documentation
  • Update CHANGELOG file
    Add the CHANGELOG entry at the top of the file.

Other Information

Remove this paragraph and mention any other important and relevant information such as benchmarks.


This change is Reviewable

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor

    • Simplified the initialization and export process for React on Rails module
    • Removed context-related complexity in module management
    • Updated module export paths and configurations
  • New Features

    • Introduced a new setReactOnRails function for module configuration
    • Added enhanced type exports and module integration

The changes streamline the React on Rails package's internal structure, improving module initialization and export mechanisms with minimal user-facing impact.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 17, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces significant changes to the React on Rails package's core modules, focusing on restructuring the ReactOnRails implementation. The modifications involve creating a new web-specific entry point, updating the context handling, and simplifying the module's initialization process. The changes aim to improve the module's flexibility and clarity by removing context-dependent complexity and establishing a more straightforward export mechanism across different environments.

Changes

File Change Summary
node_package/src/ReactOnRails.node.ts - Added import for setReactOnRails
- Updated default export
- Added types export
node_package/src/ReactOnRails.ts - Removed context-based initialization
- Simplified ReactOnRails definition
- Updated export mechanism
node_package/src/ReactOnRails.web.ts - New file created
- Imports ReactOnRails and setReactOnRails
- Exports ReactOnRails and types
node_package/src/context.ts - Changed context to named export
- Added setReactOnRails function with error handling
package.json - Updated default export path to ReactOnRails.web.js

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Module as ReactOnRails Module
    participant Context as Context Module
    participant ClientStartup as ClientStartup

    Module ->> Context: setReactOnRails(ReactOnRails)
    Context ->> Context: Validate context
    Context ->> ClientStartup: clientStartup(context)
    Context -->> Module: ReactOnRails configured
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • Judahmeek
  • alexeyr-ci

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Ode to Refactoring 🐰

In modules deep, where context once did dwell,
We've trimmed the code, and now it serves us well
No more complex paths, just clarity's delight
React on Rails now shines so clean and bright!

hop hop 🥕

Finishing Touches

  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
node_package/src/ReactOnRails.web.ts (1)

6-7: Consider adding JSDoc comments.

Adding documentation would help explain the purpose of this entry point file and its role in preventing window.ReactOnRails overwriting issues.

+/**
+ * Web-specific entry point for ReactOnRails.
+ * Ensures proper initialization in the browser context and prevents
+ * accidental overwrites of window.ReactOnRails.
+ */
export default ReactOnRails;
export * from './types';
package.json (1)

5-10: Document the dual-environment exports configuration.

The package now explicitly differentiates between Node.js and web environments. This should be documented in the README or documentation to help users understand the different bundles and their use cases.

Consider adding a section in the documentation explaining:

  • The purpose of separate web and node bundles
  • When to use each bundle
  • How this change prevents the window.ReactOnRails overwriting issue
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 34dae0d and 289c189.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • node_package/src/ReactOnRails.node.ts (1 hunks)
  • node_package/src/ReactOnRails.ts (2 hunks)
  • node_package/src/ReactOnRails.web.ts (1 hunks)
  • node_package/src/context.ts (1 hunks)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
node_package/src/context.ts

[error] 8-8: void is confusing inside a union type.

Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.

(lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: rspec-package-tests (newest)
  • GitHub Check: build-dummy-app-webpack-test-bundles (oldest)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: rspec-package-tests (oldest)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
node_package/src/ReactOnRails.web.ts (1)

1-4: LGTM! Good separation of concerns.

Creating a dedicated web entry point helps prevent context-related issues and improves module organization.

node_package/src/ReactOnRails.node.ts (1)

7-8: Verify the initialization order.

The call to setReactOnRails should come before adding streamServerRenderedReactComponent to ensure proper context setup.

-ReactOnRails.streamServerRenderedReactComponent = streamServerRenderedReactComponent;
-
-setReactOnRails(ReactOnRails);
+setReactOnRails(ReactOnRails);
+
+ReactOnRails.streamServerRenderedReactComponent = streamServerRenderedReactComponent;
node_package/src/context.ts (1)

14-36: LGTM! Robust error handling with clear messages.

The implementation includes:

  • Comprehensive context validation
  • Detailed error messages with troubleshooting steps
  • Link to relevant GitHub issue for webpack configuration
node_package/src/ReactOnRails.ts (2)

30-31: LGTM! Improved type safety and initialization.

The explicit type definition and constant declaration improve code clarity and type safety.


286-286: Consider adding unit tests for the new initialization flow.

With the significant changes to ReactOnRails initialization and context handling, ensure comprehensive test coverage.

Would you like me to help create unit tests for the new initialization flow and context handling?

package.json (1)

8-8: Verify the existence and implementation of the new web-specific file.

The export path has been updated to use a web-specific implementation. Let's verify that this file exists and is properly implemented.

✅ Verification successful

Implementation verified and properly structured

The change is valid as the web-specific implementation file (ReactOnRails.web.ts) exists in the source directory and will be compiled to the referenced path. The export configuration properly handles both web and node environments.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the new web file exists and examine its content
fd ReactOnRails.web.js$ node_package/lib/

# Check for any existing imports that might break
rg -l "from ['\"](react-on-rails|@/react-on-rails)['\"]" --type ts --type js

Length of output: 590


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find all ReactOnRails.js related files
fd ReactOnRails.*\.js$

# Check for package.json locations to understand the structure
fd package.json$

# Look for any references to the old file path
rg -l "ReactOnRails\.js"

Length of output: 798


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check node_package directory structure
fd . node_package/ --type f

# Look for build configuration
cat package-scripts.yml

# Check package.json exports configuration
cat package.json

Length of output: 7279

Comment on lines +8 to 12
export function context(this: void): Window | NodeJS.Global | void {
return ((typeof window !== 'undefined') && window) ||
((typeof global !== 'undefined') && global) ||
this;
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Fix return type to address static analysis warning.

The void type in the union is flagged as confusing. Consider using undefined instead.

-export function context(this: void): Window | NodeJS.Global | void {
+export function context(this: void): Window | NodeJS.Global | undefined {
   return ((typeof window !== 'undefined') && window) ||
     ((typeof global !== 'undefined') && global) ||
-    this;
+    undefined;
}
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
export function context(this: void): Window | NodeJS.Global | void {
return ((typeof window !== 'undefined') && window) ||
((typeof global !== 'undefined') && global) ||
this;
}
export function context(this: void): Window | NodeJS.Global | undefined {
return ((typeof window !== 'undefined') && window) ||
((typeof global !== 'undefined') && global) ||
undefined;
}
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 8-8: void is confusing inside a union type.

Unsafe fix: Use undefined instead.

(lint/suspicious/noConfusingVoidType)

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
"exports": {
".": {
"node": "./node_package/lib/ReactOnRails.node.js",
"default": "./node_package/lib/ReactOnRails.js"
"default": "./node_package/lib/ReactOnRails.web.js"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Tests needed for dual environment exports configuration

The current test suite doesn't cover the new conditional exports feature. Please add tests to verify:

  • Module loading in Node.js environment using ReactOnRails.node.js
  • Module loading in web environment using ReactOnRails.web.js
  • Correct resolution of exports based on environment
🔗 Analysis chain

Consider adding tests for the new export configuration.

Since this change affects how the package is imported and used, ensure there are tests covering both Node.js and web environments.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for existing test files related to exports
fd -e test.ts -e test.js -e spec.ts -e spec.js node_package/tests/

Length of output: 450


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find all test files in node_package directory
fd -e test.js -e test.ts -e spec.js -e spec.ts . node_package

# Search for export-related test content
rg -l "ReactOnRails.web" --type-add 'test:*.{test,spec}.{js,ts}' -t test

# Check package.json exports configuration
cat package.json

Length of output: 3548


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check content of main test file
cat node_package/tests/ReactOnRails.test.js

# Search for environment-specific testing patterns
rg -A 5 "describe|it\(" node_package/tests/ReactOnRails.test.js

# Look for import/require statements in tests
rg "require\(.*ReactOnRails\)|import.*ReactOnRails" node_package/tests/

Length of output: 6176

@alexeyr-ci alexeyr-ci closed this Jan 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants