-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 595
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: update blas/ext/base/grev
to follow current project conventions
#4659
Conversation
--- type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes. report: - task: lint_filenames status: passed - task: lint_editorconfig status: passed - task: lint_markdown status: passed - task: lint_package_json status: na - task: lint_repl_help status: passed - task: lint_javascript_src status: passed - task: lint_javascript_cli status: na - task: lint_javascript_examples status: na - task: lint_javascript_tests status: na - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks status: passed - task: lint_python status: na - task: lint_r status: na - task: lint_c_src status: na - task: lint_c_examples status: na - task: lint_c_benchmarks status: na - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures status: na - task: lint_shell status: na - task: lint_typescript_declarations status: passed - task: lint_typescript_tests status: na - task: lint_license_headers status: passed --- --- type: pre_push_report description: Results of running various checks prior to pushing changes. report: - task: run_javascript_examples status: na - task: run_c_examples status: na - task: run_cpp_examples status: na - task: run_javascript_readme_examples status: na - task: run_c_benchmarks status: na - task: run_cpp_benchmarks status: na - task: run_fortran_benchmarks status: na - task: run_javascript_benchmarks status: na - task: run_julia_benchmarks status: na - task: run_python_benchmarks status: na - task: run_r_benchmarks status: na - task: run_javascript_tests status: na ---
Coverage Report
The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR. |
--- type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes. report: - task: lint_filenames status: passed - task: lint_editorconfig status: passed - task: lint_markdown status: na - task: lint_package_json status: na - task: lint_repl_help status: na - task: lint_javascript_src status: na - task: lint_javascript_cli status: na - task: lint_javascript_examples status: na - task: lint_javascript_tests status: na - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks status: passed - task: lint_python status: na - task: lint_r status: na - task: lint_c_src status: na - task: lint_c_examples status: na - task: lint_c_benchmarks status: na - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures status: na - task: lint_shell status: na - task: lint_typescript_declarations status: na - task: lint_typescript_tests status: na - task: lint_license_headers status: passed --- --- type: pre_push_report description: Results of running various checks prior to pushing changes. report: - task: run_javascript_examples status: na - task: run_c_examples status: na - task: run_cpp_examples status: na - task: run_javascript_readme_examples status: na - task: run_c_benchmarks status: na - task: run_cpp_benchmarks status: na - task: run_fortran_benchmarks status: na - task: run_javascript_benchmarks status: passed - task: run_julia_benchmarks status: na - task: run_python_benchmarks status: na - task: run_r_benchmarks status: na - task: run_javascript_tests status: na ---
for ( i = 0; i < len; i++ ) { | ||
x.push( ( randu()*20.0 ) - 10.0 ); | ||
} | ||
var x = gfillBy( len, new Float64Array( len ), 1, uniform( -100, 100 ) ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we please change this back to a generic array instead of Float64Array
.
var x = gfillBy( len, new Float64Array( len ), 1, uniform( -100, 100 ) ); | |
var x = gfillBy( len, new Array( len ), 1, uniform( -100, 100 ) ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same comment.
for ( i = 0; i < len; i++ ) { | ||
x.push( ( randu()*20.0 ) - 10.0 ); | ||
} | ||
var x = gfillBy( len, new Float64Array( len ), 1, uniform( -100, 100 ) ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
var x = gfillBy( len, new Float64Array( len ), 1, uniform( -100, 100 ) ); | |
var x = gfillBy( len, new Array( len ), 1, uniform( -100, 100 ) ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Planeshifter This wasn't the correct change. If we wanted generic arrays, then we should have used @stdlib/array/base/zeros
to ensure that the resultant array is not in dictionary mode.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's problematic, especially for large arrays, as it can tank performance, thus throwing off benchmark results.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@headlessNode Would you mind submitting a follow-up PR addressing this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This would also be a good lint rule. Namely, we should disallow new Array(...)
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kgryte I actually did use the @stdlib/array/base/zeros
, see next commit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@headlessNode One step ahead of me!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I should have looked at the final code, rather than just relying on the e-mail thread of discussions.
--- type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes. report: - task: lint_filenames status: passed - task: lint_editorconfig status: passed - task: lint_markdown status: na - task: lint_package_json status: na - task: lint_repl_help status: na - task: lint_javascript_src status: na - task: lint_javascript_cli status: na - task: lint_javascript_examples status: na - task: lint_javascript_tests status: na - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks status: passed - task: lint_python status: na - task: lint_r status: na - task: lint_c_src status: na - task: lint_c_examples status: na - task: lint_c_benchmarks status: na - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures status: na - task: lint_shell status: na - task: lint_typescript_declarations status: na - task: lint_typescript_tests status: na - task: lint_license_headers status: passed --- --- type: pre_push_report description: Results of running various checks prior to pushing changes. report: - task: run_javascript_examples status: na - task: run_c_examples status: na - task: run_cpp_examples status: na - task: run_javascript_readme_examples status: na - task: run_c_benchmarks status: na - task: run_cpp_benchmarks status: na - task: run_fortran_benchmarks status: na - task: run_javascript_benchmarks status: passed - task: run_julia_benchmarks status: na - task: run_python_benchmarks status: na - task: run_r_benchmarks status: na - task: run_javascript_tests status: na ---
@Planeshifter Changes applied. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great, thanks!
PR Commit Message
Please review the above commit message and make any necessary adjustments. |
…ntions PR-URL: stdlib-js#4659 Reviewed-by: Philipp Burckhardt <[email protected]>
Description
This pull request:
Related Issues
No.
Questions
No.
Other
No.
Checklist
@stdlib-js/reviewers